Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 18;21(1):70–77. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2019.5734

Table 1.

Candidate variants used for cosegregation analysis


Gene Position Zygosity Variant db SNP ID MAF in genomAD (exome_all) CADD GERP++ SiPhy

RASA1 Chr5: 86659294 Hom NM_002890: c.1583A>G. p.Tyr528Cys rs145752649 0.0015 28.3 5.58 15.75
BBS12 Chr 4: 123664906 Hom NM_152618: c.1859 A>G: p.Gln620Arg rs368861241 0.0005 23.7 5.81 10.955
HUWE1 Chr X: 53602150 Hemi NM_031407: c. 6062C>T:p.Thr2021Ile Novel ND 22.6 4.37 12.15
MYO1E Chr 15: 59430501 Het NM_004998: c. 3146 C>A: p.Pro1049His rs147579391 0.0023 31 5.79 20.044
MYO1E Chr 15: 59519746 Het NM_004998: c.554 G>A p.Asp185Gly rs141565214 0.0022 25 6.02 16.545

Mutations were named according to http://varnomen.hgvs.org/.

SNP; Single nucleotide polymorphisms, MAF; Minor allele frequency, CADD; Combined annotation dependent depletion, GERP++; Genomic evolutionary rate profiling, Chr; Chromosome, Hom; Homozygous, Hemi; Hemizygous, Het; Heterozygous, and ND; No data.