Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;21(12):1114–1127. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy084

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Enriched housing attenuated glial reactivation in the hippocampus of socially isolated (SI) aged mice. (A,B) Representative images showing expression and distribution of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes (A) and Iba-1 positive microglia (B) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus of mice with 4 different housing patterns. (C,D) The percentage of GFAP (C) and Iba-1 (D) positive areas in the mPFC and hippocampus, respectively. Enriched housing resulted in a significantly decreased percentage of positive area for GFAP or Iba-1 in the hippocampus but not mPFC of isolated mice. Housing (GFAP: mPFC, F1,12=16.780, P=.001; hippocampus, F1,12=39.400; Iba-1: mPFC, F1,12=31.869, P<.001; hippocampus, F1,12=10.057, P=.008); environment (GFAP: mPFC, F1,12=2.488, P=.141; hippocampus, F1,12=7.007, P=.021 Iba-1: mPFC, F1,12=2.597, P=.133; hippocampus, F1,12=10.674, P=.007); interaction effects (GFAP: mPFC, F1,12=0.595, P=.456; hippocampus, F1,12=1.553, P=.237; Iba-1: mPFC, F1,12=0.000, P=.994; hippocampus, F1,12=4.062, P=.067). #P<.05; ##P<.01, SI housing vs group housing (GR); *P<.05, enriched environment (EE) vs standard environment (SE). Data were analyzed by ANOVA with 2-way Tukey’s posthoc test and expressed as mean±SEM from 4 mice per group.