Table 2.
LowLF (n=11) | HighLF (n=13) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Energy Expenditure and Substrate Oxidation a | |||
Energy expenditure (kcal/kg BW/day) | 14.4 ± 2.9 | 15.5 ± 2.4 | .32 |
Glucose oxidation (mg/kg BW/min) | 1.07 ± 0.35 | 0.96 ± 0.36 | .48 |
Fat oxidation (mg/kg BW/min) | 0.55 ± 0.18 | 0.68 ± 0.19 | .10 |
Insulin Sensitivity Measures b | |||
SI (10−4 * min−1 per μU/mL) | 3.1 ± 1.4 | 2.2 ± 1.4 | .14 |
AIRg (μU/mL * min) | 568 ± 407 | 489 ± 304 | .60 |
Disposition index (unitless) | 1431 ± 668 | 962 ± 637 | .09 |
Plasma FFA Kinetics c | |||
Total RaFFA μmol/kg FM/min) | 9.98 ± 2.80 | 12.73 ± 6.30 | .20 |
Adipose RaFFA μmol/kg FM/min) | 9.57 ± 2.65 | 12.28 ± 6.17 | .19 |
RaSpillover μmol/kg FM/min) | 0.37 ± 0.29 | 0.43 ± 0.23 | .53 |
Mean FFA residence time (min) d | 6.54 ± 1.66 | 6.75 ± 2.97 | .84 |
T½ life (min) | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 2.1 | .84 |
VLDL-TG Concentrations and Kinetics e | |||
VLDL-TG concentration (mmol/L) | 0.39 ± 0.22 | 0.60 ± 0.29 | .07 |
Total Production Rate (ìmol/min) | 8.6 ± 3.0 | 11.0 ± 4.5 | .16 |
TG Production from Adipose (ìmol/min) | 4.34 ± 1.82 | 4.06 ± 2.57 | .77 |
TG Production from Evening Meal (ìmol/min) | 0.46 ± 0.24 | 0.56 ± 0.25 | .39 |
TG Production from Lipogenesis (ìmol/min) | 0.78 ± 0.42 | 2.57 ± 1.53 | .001 |
Fractional Catabolic Rate (% / hr) | 28.0 ± 11.1 | 24.8 ± 7.6 | .44 |
T½ life (h) | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.3 | .65 |
Clearance Rate (mL/min) | 27.0 ± 12.2 | 20.1 ± 6.3 | .11 |
Data are mean ± SD. Abbreviations: SI, insulin sensitivity index; AIRg, acute insulin response to glucose, RaFFA, rate of appearance of FFA.
Fasting energy expenditure and substrate oxidation were determined at 0800.
Data are calculated from the frequently-sampled insulin-modified IVGTT using MINMOD software.
Plasma FFA kinetics were determined by the average values taken at the end of the study sampling period (1030, 1145).
Mean residence time is the average time a FFA molecule spends in the volume of distribution.
n=11/group; two subjects in the high liver fat (LF) group were excluded from this analysis because they had VLDL-TG concentrations that were more than 2 SD greater than the mean of all other subjects.