Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;103(7):2680–2688. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00385

Table 2.

Associations Between Male and Female Seafood Intake at Baseline and During Follow-Up and Frequency of Sexual Intercourse (n = 501 Couples; 2372 Follow-Up Cycles)

Variable Subjects or Cycles, n (%) % Difference in SIF (95% CI)
Model 1a Model 2b
Male baseline seafood intake
 Two times or less per month 153 (31) Reference Reference
 Three to four times per month 118 (24) 3.0 (−9.9 to 17.7) 2.5 (−10.5 to 17.4)
 Five to eight times per month 135 (27) 7.5 (−5.3 to 22.0) 7.1 (−6.4 to 22.4)
 Nine times or more per month 95 (19) 22.9 (6.8 to 41.5) 21.7 (4.6 to 41.7)
P for trend 0.007 0.02
Female baseline seafood intake
 Two times or less per month 177 (35) Reference Reference
 Three to four times per month 95 (19) 1.1 (−11.9 to 16.0) −2.8 (−15.5 to 11.8)
 Five to eight times per month 147 (29) 1.4 (−10.0 to 14.1) −3.8 (−15.1 to 9.1)
 Nine times or more per month 82 (16) 17.3 (1.2 to 36.0) 9.7 (−6.3 to 28.4)
P for trend 0.12 0.60
Male daily journal seafood intake
 One serving or less per cycle 814 (34) Reference Reference
 One to three servings per cycle 422 (18) 4.8 (−0.8 to 10.9) 4.8 (−1.1 to 11.0)
 Four to seven servings per cycle 575 (24) 16.7 (10.8 to 23.0) 15.2 (8.8 to 22.1)
 Eight servings or more per cycle 561 (24) 32.6 (25.4 to 40.2) 26.9 (18.7 to 35.6)
P for trend <0.001 <0.001
Female daily journal seafood intake
 One serving or less per cycle 835 (35) Reference Reference
 One to three servings per cycle 446 (19) 2.5 (−3.2 to 8.5) −1.5 (−7.2 to 4.5)
 Four to seven servings per cycle 605 (26) 9.4 (3.7 to 15.4) 0.5 (-5.2 to 6.6)
 Eight servings or more per cycle 486 (20) 26.4 (19.2 to 34.0) 10.2 (2.9 to 18.2)
P for trend <0.001 0.009
Couple daily journal seafood intake
 At least one partner consumed fewer than 8 servings per cycle 2057 (87) Reference
 Both partners consumed eight servings or more per cycle 315 (13) 21.9 (15.2 to 29.0)

Generalized linear mixed models with Poisson distribution and log link were used to estimate the percentage of difference (95% CIs); cycles with >50% of days with missing information on SIF and cycles with <14 days of follow-up (n = 159 cycles) had their SIF values imputed (using five multiple imputations).

a

Model 1 adjusted for cycle length, female age, difference in male and female age, female race (non-Hispanic white vs other), male exercise (yes vs no), and male and female alcohol intake (one or more times per week vs less than one time per week).

b

Model 2 adjusted for variables in model 1 plus male or female partner seafood intake (using the same assessment method).