Table 3.
Performance comparison
Benchmark data |
Human genome |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Program | Time | # mapped | Time | # mapped |
GNUMap | 47.9 s | 71 262 | 985 m 14 s | 7 739 321 |
Bowtie | 7.0 s | 62 298 | 14 m 43 s | 6 699 526 |
SOAP | 11.7 s | 62 208 | 32 m 20 s | 6 764 050 |
MAQ | 46.5 s | 62 208 | *3488 m 28 s | 6 764 054 |
Slider | 16 m 31 s* | 58 551 | Crashed | Crashed |
SeqMap | 81.2 s | 56 326 | 1703 m 04 s | 5 455 538 |
Novocraft | 24.4 s | 56 238 | *920 m 25 s | 5 306 782 |
RMAP | 9.2 s | 1202 | *295 m 54 s | 3 447 086 |
Bold values show that GNUMAP achieves the best performance.