Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 23;59(12):2308–2320. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M085209

TABLE 2.

FA distribution profile of TAG, DAG, FFA, or CE in BAT from Th+/+ and Th+/− mice

Percent of +/− Content vs. Th+/+ (29°C), % Statistical Significance
TAG
 14:00 189.71 ns
 16:0 175.58 ***
 16:1n-9 151.91 ns
 16:1n-7 201.60 **
 18:0 141.10 ns
 18:1n-9 195.98 ***
 18:1n-7 22.24 ns
 18:2n-6 164.42 **
 18:3n-3 155.56 ns
 20:0 187.69 ns
 20:1n-9 230.35 ns
 20:1n-7 70.53 ns
 20:2n-6 319.92 ns
 20:3n-6 281.93 ns
 20:4n-6 153.95 ns
 22:0 191.53 ns
 22:1n-9 280.14 ns
CE
 16:0 99.99 ns
 16:1n-9 87.56 ns
 18:0 103.69 ns
 18:1n-9 194.13 ns
DAG
 14:00 97.02 ns
 16:0 144.27 ***
 16:1n-9 110.07 ns
 16:1n-7 156.77 ns
 18:0 132.05 ns
 18:1n-9 137.05 *
 18:2n-6 122.32 ns
FFA
 14:0 44.79 ns
 16:0 56.52 ***
 16:1n-9 48.05 ns
 16:1n-7 49.12 ns
 18:0 64.87 ***
 18:1 73.91 ns
 18:2 78.66 ns
 20:0 36.71 ns
 20:1n-9 66.85 ns
 20:4n-6 57.76 ns
 22:0 4.86 ns

Th+/#x2212: Percentage of FAs in BAT of Th+/− versus Th+/+ mice at 29°C. Data are mean ± SEM. n = 10 or 11/group. Two-way ANOVA was used. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.