Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2018 Jul 27;167:248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.022

Table 3.

Diabetes odds ratios for categories of cumulative arsenic water concentrations lagged 40 years stratified by healthy (<25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2) BMI

BMI level
(kg/m2)
Arsenic level
(µg/L)
Diabetes
Unadjusted
OR (95% CI)
Adjusted*
OR (95% CI)
Yes No
Healthy
(<25)
0–609 18 102 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
610–5279 16 116 0.78 (0.38–1.61) 0.75 (0.36–1.56)
≥5280 32 123 1.47 (0.78–2.78) 1.45 (0.74–2.84)
p-trend 0.08 0.09
Overweight
(≥25 to <30)
0–609 27 113 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
610–5279 34 117 1.22 (0.69–2.15) 1.12 (0.62–2.00)
≥5280 43 111 1.62 (0.94–2.80) 1.34 (0.76–2.35)
p-trend 0.08 0.31
Obese
(≥30)
0–609 25 61 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
610–5279 18 45 0.98 (0.48–2.00) 1.04 (0.49–2.20)
≥5280 18 20 2.20 (1.00–4.83) 2.64 (1.14–6.11)
p-trend 0.04 0.02

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference group

*

Adjusted for age (<60, 60–70, >70 years old), sex, cancer status, smoking (never-smokers, >0 to <10, ≥10 cigarettes/day)

#

Similar findings among cancer cases vs controls