Table 1.
Performance Parameters of Our Solid-State EC Devices in Comparison with That of Solid-State Devices Reported in the Literature
Counter Electrode Material | Phase | Deposition Method | ΔT (%) | tcolor (s) | tbleach (s) | CE (cm2/C) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NiO porous film | Crystalline | Chemical bath deposition | 55 | 10 | 20 | 87.2 | Zhang et al., 2009a |
NiO nanoparticle film | Crystalline | Inkjet printing | 75 | 10 | 13 | 131.9 | Cai et al., 2016ab |
NiOx film | Crystalline | Magnetron sputtering | 52 | 5 | 2 | – | Liu et al., 2016c |
NiOxfilm | Amorphous | Photodeposition | 60 | 4 | 6 | 141 | this workd |
NiOxfilm | Crystalline | Photodeposition | 26 | 78 | 17 | 72 | this workd |
All devices use WO3 as the electrochromic layer, NiOx as the counter electrode, and a polymer-based electrolyte.
Measured at 633 nm over the −2.5 to +2.5 V potential range.
Measured at 550 nm over the −2.5 to +2.5 V potential range.
Measured at 550 nm over the −1.8 to +1.8 V potential range.
Measured at 633 nm over the −2.1 to +2.1 V potential range.