Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;9:5126. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07431-3

Table 1.

Solar cell designs in order of increasing yearly energy yield

Junctions Suns kWh m−2 year−1 Ef. (%) Std. Ef. (%) Rec. (%) Gaps (eV)
1 Diffuse 1 106.3 27.76 1.42 Diffuse light only
1 Si 1 617.7 25.87 26.98 26.7 1.12 Gap not optimal, EQE = 1
1 1 648.2 27.14 27.84 28.8 1.35 ERE = 0.2
2 1 758.0 31.81 33.39 32.8 1.13, 1.69
1 + 1 1 792.6 33.26 34.32 32.8 1.13, 1.81
3 1000 805.5 41.56 44.31 44.4 0.95, 1.35, 1.82
3 HG 1 830.6 34.78 36.88 33.3 1.12, 1.48, 1.94
3 1 849.3 35.63 37.65 37.9 0.95, 1.38, 1.86
4 1000 856.6 44.19 47.15 46.0 0.74, 1.14, 1.48, 1.91
5 HG 1000 870.4 44.90 47.71 0.94, 1.18, 1.44, 1.71, 2.09
2 + 2 1000 879.6 45.38 47.56 0.73, 1.14, 1.54, 1.97
5 1000 884.1 45.61 49.11 0.72, 1.02, 1.29, 1.61, 2.01
6 1000 911.6 47.03 50.19 0.70, 0.98, 1.21, 1.46, 1.74, 2.11
3 + 3 1000 939.8 48.48 51.21 0.71, 1.00, 1.25, 1.56, 1.83, 2.19
Bi + 2 1 1007.9 36.00 37.62 35.9 1.12 + 1.58, 2.02
Bi + 5 HG 1000 1116.8 44.90 47.71 1.12 + 0.94, 1.18, 1.44, 1.71, 2.09

Mechanical stacking is denoted by a plus sign

Ef. is the yearly averaged efficiency, Rec. is the experimental record efficiency17, HG is the high band gap local efficiency maximum, Bi is the energy yield of concentrator modules including bifacial silicon solar cells in the back of the module for collecting diffuse and albedo irradiance20