Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;9:2345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02345

Table 1.

Fit indices for the structural models tested (N = 2,983).

Model χ2 df TLI CFI RMSEA 90% CI
Model 1: One factor with correlated error 17461.732 799 0.81 0.82 0.084 0.083–0.085
Model 2: Two state factors: SS and CS 2419.063 188 0.95 0.95 0.063 0.061–0.065
Model 3: Two trait factors: ST and CT 2589.648 188 0.94 0.94 0.065 0.063–0.068
Model 4: Two factors: State and trait 28848.444 818 0.69 0.71 0.107 0.106–0.108
Model 5: Two factors: Somatic and cognitive with correlated error 10112.356 797 0.89 0.90 0.063 0.062–0.064
Model 6: Four factors (ST, CT, SS, CS) 18244.376 813 0.81 0.82 0.085 0.084–0.085
Model 7: Bifactor with four group factors (ST, CT, SS, CS) and one general factor 25349.554 778 0.71 0.74 0.103 0.102–0.104
Model 8: Hierarchical structure 24872.698 815 0.74 0.75 0.099 0.098–0.101

p < 0.001. Model 7-8: (Roberts et al., 2016); Model 2-3: (Ree et al., 2008); Model 4-5-1: (Grös et al., 2007).

ST, STICSA somatic trait; CT, STICSA cognitive trait; SS, STICSA somatic state; CS, STICSA cognitive state; df, degrees of freedom; TLI, tucker lewis index; CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, root-mean-square error of approximation; 90% CI, 90% confidence interval of RMSEA.