Table 3.
(A) Populations | (B) Mountains and Populations | (C) Environments and Populations | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pop. | Ind. | Mt. | Pop. | Ind. | Env. | Pop. | Ind. | |||
Total | 0.09 (FPop/T)∗ | 0.32 (FInd/T) ∗ | Total | 0.05 (FMt/T)∗ | 0.10 (FPop/T)∗ | 0.33 (FInd/T)∗ | Total | 0.00 (Fenv/T) | 0.09 (FPop/T)∗ | 0.32 (FInd/T)∗ |
Pop. | 0.00 | 0.25 (FInd/Pop)∗ | Mt. | 0.00 | 0.06 (FPop/Mt)∗ | 0.30 (FInd/Mt)∗ | Env. | 0.00 | 0.09 (FPop/Env)∗ | 0.32 (FInd/Env)∗ |
Pop. | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 (FInd/Pop/Mt)∗ | Pop. | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 (FInd/Pop/Env)∗ | |||
The entire sample was used to analyze the genetic structure based on three hierarchical conformations: (A) only considering populations, (B) population nested within mountain range and (C) population nested within environments. Pop., populations; Mt., mountain ranges; Env., environments; Ind., individuals. We show the F values for each of the conformations represented in parentheses. For example, FMt/T represents the genetic variance among mountains, FPop/Mt genetic variation among populations within mountains and FInd/Pop/Mt genetic variation among individuals within populations within mountains. Asterisks denote significant values tested by bootstrapping with 1000 randomizations.