Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;9:1698. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01698

Table 3.

Hierarchical Fst results.

(A) Populations (B) Mountains and Populations (C) Environments and Populations



Pop. Ind. Mt. Pop. Ind. Env. Pop. Ind.
Total 0.09 (FPop/T) 0.32 (FInd/T) Total 0.05 (FMt/T) 0.10 (FPop/T) 0.33 (FInd/T) Total 0.00 (Fenv/T) 0.09 (FPop/T) 0.32 (FInd/T)
Pop. 0.00 0.25 (FInd/Pop) Mt. 0.00 0.06 (FPop/Mt) 0.30 (FInd/Mt) Env. 0.00 0.09 (FPop/Env) 0.32 (FInd/Env)
Pop. 0.00 0.00 0.25 (FInd/Pop/Mt) Pop. 0.00 0.00 0.25 (FInd/Pop/Env)

The entire sample was used to analyze the genetic structure based on three hierarchical conformations: (A) only considering populations, (B) population nested within mountain range and (C) population nested within environments. Pop., populations; Mt., mountain ranges; Env., environments; Ind., individuals. We show the F values for each of the conformations represented in parentheses. For example, FMt/T represents the genetic variance among mountains, FPop/Mt genetic variation among populations within mountains and FInd/Pop/Mt genetic variation among individuals within populations within mountains. Asterisks denote significant values tested by bootstrapping with 1000 randomizations.