Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Care. 2018 Jan 22;30(4):523–530. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1429560

Table 3.

Logistic regressions on factors associated with sexual risk behaviors

Characteristics Multiple sex partners Inconsistent condom use Less condom use than before HIV diagnosis
cOR(95% CI) aOR(95% CI) cOR(95% CI) aOR(95% CI) cOR(95% CI) aOR(95% CI)
Age group
 < 30 1.70(1.06,2.73)* 1.24(0.68,2.26) 1.29(0.98,1.70) 1.25(0.93,1.69) 1.20(0.89,1.63) 1.15(0.84,1.59)
 30–49 Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 ≥ 50 1.96(1.20,3.20)** 2.20(1.26,3.84)** 1.54(1.14,2.09)** 1.65(1.19,2.30)** 1.68(1.23,2.29)** 1.73(1.25,2.40)**
Gender
 Male 2.61(1.67,4.08)*** 0.93(0.53,1.63) 0.93(0.75,1.14) ___ 0.84(0.67,1.06) 0.98(0.74,1.30)
 Female Reference Reference Reference ___ Reference Reference
Ethnicity
 Han 0.94(0.63,1.41) ___ 1.12(0.90,1.40) ___ 1.15(0.90,1.47) ___
 Non-Han Reference ___ Reference ___ Reference ___
Same-sex behavior
 Yes Reference ___ Reference Reference Reference ___
 No 1.19(0.62,2.26) ___ 1.40(1.01,1.95)* 1.52(1.08,2.16)* 0.99(0.70,1.42) ___
Education in years 1.01(0.95,1.08) ___ 0.99(0.95,1.02) ___ 0.94(0.91,0.98)** 0.95(0.92,0.99)*
Monthly household income (RMB)
 0–999 1.27(0.80,2.03) 1.16(0.68,1.98) 1.45(1.15,1.82)** 1.37(1.07,1.75)* 1.26(0.98,1.64) ___
 1000–1999 Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference ___
 2000–2999 1.94(1.07,3.53)* 1.77(0.91,3.46) 0.89(0.63,1.26) 0.90(0.63,1.30) 1.26(0.86,1.83) ___
 ≥ 3000 2.65(1.37,5.15)** 2.22(1.03,4.78)* 1.14(0.75,1.75) 1.15(0.73,1.80) 1.06(0.66,1.72) ___
Self-report health status
 Very good 1.02(0.62,1.67) ___ 0.83(0.63,1.08) 0.93(0.70,1.24) 0.91(0.68,1.22) ___
 Good 1.08(0.68,1.72) ___ 0.81(0.63,1.04) 0.82(0.63,1.08) 0.80(0.60,1.06) ___
 Normal Reference ___ Reference Reference Reference ___
 Bad 0.84(0.41,1.75) ___ 1.27(0.88,1.82) 1.21(0.82,1.79) 1.04(0.70,1.54) ___
Steady partner infected with HIV
 Yes Reference Reference 2.52(1.99,3.19)*** 2.45(1.89,3.16)*** 1.43(1.10,1.85)** 1.27(0.97,1.67)
 No 1.76(1.04,2.98)* 1.10(0.63,1.91) Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Don’t know 5.60(3.05,10.27)*** 3.25(1.70,6.20)*** 3.40(2.24,5.16)*** 3.40(2.20,5.25)*** 1.66(1.08,2.57)* 1.70(1.09,2.64)*
 No steady partner 34.45(19.11,62.10)*** 21.85(11.54,41.37)*** 2.84(1.73,4.67)*** 2.55(1.49,4.35)*** 1.68(1.00,2.83)* 1.72(1.01,2.94)*
Transmission route
 Steady partner Reference Reference 1.33(1.04,1.70)* 1.23(0.93,1.62) 1.54(1.17,2.04)** 1.58(1.14,2.21)**
 Casual/commercial partner 11.22(5.11,24.64)*** 6.81(2.83,16.38)*** Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Injection drug use 10.13(4.37,23.51)*** 6.89(2.63,18.06)*** 1.32(0.97,1.81) 1.21(0.85,1.71) 1.31(0.92,1.86) 1.37(0.95,1.97)
 Other/don’t know 2.67(1.01,7.11)* 1.96(0.69,5.54) 1.22(0.91,1.64) 1.11(0.81,1.53) 1.25(0.89,1.74) 1.26(0.89,1.78)
*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01;

***

p ≤ .001 (two-tailed).

Note: potential predictors with p-value < 0.2 in univariate logistic regression were entered into multiple logistic regression models.