Table 4.
Amplitudes |
Latencies |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison | W | p | r | W | p | R |
Sham before vs. during | 166.00 | 0.65 | 0.07 | 123.00 | 0.79 | 0.04 |
Sham during vs. after | 154.00 | 0.91 | 0.02 | 171.00 | 0.64 | 0.07 |
Sham before vs. after | 183.00 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 141.50 | 0.81 | 0.04 |
Anodal before vs. during | 159.00 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 181.50 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
Anodal during vs. after | 146.00 | 0.91 | 0.02 | 114.00 | 0.30 | 0.15 |
Anodal before vs. after | 144.00 | 0.86 | 0.02 | 165.00 | 0.41 | 0.12 |
Before sham vs. anodal | 160.00 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 127.00 | 0.51 | 0.09 |
During sham vs. anodal | 117.00 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 190.50 | 0.25 | 0.16 |
After sham vs. anodal | 144.00 | 0.86 | 0.02 | 121.00 | 0.85 | 0.03 |
Reported p-values are uncorrected (significance level at Bonferroni-Holm-corrected global α = 0.05, α1 = 0.006, separately for amplitudes and latencies).