Table 6.
Amplitudes |
Latencies |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison | W | p | r | W | P | r |
Sham before vs. during | 121.00 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 112.50 | 0.65 | 0.07 |
Sham during vs. after | 125.00 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 135.00 | 0.93 | 0.01 |
Sham before vs. after | 109.00 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 151.00 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Anodal before vs. during | 120.00 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 147.00 | 0.93 | 0.01 |
Anodal during vs. after | 175.00 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 91.50 | 0.10 | 0.24 |
Anodal before vs. after | 151.00 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 124.00 | 0.46 | 0.11 |
Before sham vs. anodal | 141.00 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 148.00 | 0.95 | 0.01 |
During sham vs. anodal | 132.00 | 0.61 | 0.07 | 166.00 | 0.65 | 0.07 |
After sham vs. anodal | 186.00 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 125.00 | 0.69 | 0.06 |
Reported p-values are uncorrected (significance level at Bonferroni-Holm-corrected global α = 0.05, α1 = 0.006, separately for amplitudes and latencies).