. 2018 Nov 27;9:1694. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01694

Table 3.

QTLs detected separately in trifoliate orange and sweet orange genetic maps.

Trait	QTL name	Time	LG^a	Thold LOD^b	Max LOD^c	QTL position^d	R² (%)^e	Nearest marker^f	Marker position^g	Allele type^h	KW significanceⁱ
Foliar symptom	FS-2015-t6a	2015	t6	2.7	4.0	43.8	20.9	6_19748604	43.8	A/G	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-t6b	2015	t6	2.7	3.9	55.4	20.8	6_21328107	54.4	T/C	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-t8a	2015	t8	2.7	4.3	39.5	22.1	8_5646672	39.5	G/A	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-t8b	2015	t8	2.7	5.0	54.9	24.6	8_18164251	54.9	T/C	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-t9a	2015	t9	2.7	4.8	66.0	24.5	9_25649934	66.0	A/T	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-t9b	2015	t9	2.7	3.8	83.9	20.8	9_28915131	82.9	A/G	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2016-t6	2016	t6	2.7	5.5	47.8	29.9	6_20249564	49.7	A/G	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2016-t8	2016	t8	2.7	2.7	55.6	13.9	8_18728386	55.6	T/C	^∗∗∗∗
	FS-2016-t9	2016	t9	2.7	3.2	83.9	18.1	9_29102006	84.9	C/T	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-s7a	2015	s7	2.6	4.7	56.3	25.3	7_11398231	56.3	A/T	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2015-s7b	2015	s7	2.6	5.5	67.1	29.1	7_15491756	67.1	T/C	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2016-s7a	2016	s7	2.6	3.5	43.9	19.5	7_7947819	43.9	C/T	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	FS-2016-s7b	2016	s7	2.6	3.1	73.5	17.3	8_20039431	73.5	G/A	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}
Canopy damage	CD-2015-t6	2015	t6	2.7	3.7	43.4	22.0	6_19837597	43.4	T/C	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	CD-2015-t8	2015	t8	2.7	3.0	50.2	16.8	8_8274031	50.2	C/G	^∗∗∗∗
	CD-2015-t9	2015	t9	2.7	3.5	59.5	21.2	9_22115818	57.5	A/T	^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}
	CD-2016-t6	2016	t6	2.7	2.8	27.9	14.6	6_17324675	27.9	C/A	^∗∗∗∗
	CD-2016-t7	2016	t7	2.7	3.0	35.0	15.9	7_4403223	33.0	C/A	^{∗∗∗∗∗}

^aThe linkage group of trifoliate orange (t1–t9) or sweet orange (s1–s9) where QTL was detected. ^bThe threshold LOD score was determined by 1,000 permutation tests in the genome-wide map. ^cThe maximum LOD score of each QTL was determined by Interval Mapping. ^dThe QTL position (in cM) from the top of LG corresponding to the maximum LOD score. ^eThe percentage of the total phenotypic variation explained by QTL. ^fThe name of the nearest marker also represent the genomic position in the reference genome. ^gThe position (in cM) of the nearest marker from the top of the corresponding linkage group. ^hThe allele nucleobase type of the nearest marker with the first base unique in the detected parent. ⁱThe significance level of the Kruskal–Wallis test: ^∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001; ^{∗∗∗∗∗}p < 0.00001; ^{∗∗∗∗∗∗}p < 0.000001; ^{∗∗∗∗∗∗∗}p < 0.0000001.