Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 11;99(18):1401–1409. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm128

Table 2.

Association between secretor MBL2 polymorphisms and disease-specific survival*

White patients African American patients


Genotype No. (%) RR of death (95 % CI) P No. (%) RR of death (95 % CI) P
Promoter SNPs
  L/H (mbl2_11; rs11003125)
    C/C (L/L) 215 (41.1) 1.0 (referent) 120 (71.4) 1.0 (referent)
    C/G (L/H) 238 (45.5) 0.94 (0.70 to 1.26) .67 44 (26.2) 1.02 (0.62 to 1.69) .93
    G/G (H/H) 70 (13.4) 1.29 (0.86 to 1.92) .22 4 (2.4) 2.27 (0.70 to 7.41) .14
  Y/X (mbl2_12; rs7096206)
    G/G (Y/Y) 329 (61.7) 1.0 (referent) 124 (73.4) 1.0 (referent)
    G/C (Y/X) 180 (33.8) 0.61 (0.46 to 0.82) .001 41 (24.3) 1.02 (0.63 to 1.66) .96
    C/C (X/X) 24 (4.5) 0.62 (0.31 to 1.27) .20 4 (2.3) 2.76 (0.81 to 9.40) .11
    G/C + C/C§ 204 (38.3) 0.61 (0.46 to 0.81) .001 45 (26.6) 1.11 (0.69 to 1.77) .69
Exon 1 SNPs
  A/D (mbl2_03; rs5030737)
    C/C (non-D/non-D) 447 (85.0) 1.0 (referent) 160 (96.4) 1.0 (referent)
    C/T (non-D/D) 75 (14.2) 0.97 (0.68 to 1.40) .89 6 (3.6) 0.48 (0.11 to 1.98) .30
    T/T (D/D) 4 (0.8) 3.32 (0.68 to 13.64) .10 0
  A/B (mbl2_01; rs1800450)
    G/G (non-B/non-B) 391 (75.5) 1.0 (referent) 152 (91.6) 1.0 (referent)
    G/A (non-B/B) 120 (23.2) 0.86 (0.63 to 1.17) .34 13 (7.8) 1.63 (0.67 to 3.95) .28
    A/A (B/B) 7 (1.3) 1.91 (0.60 to 6.07) .28 1 (0.6)
  A/C (mbl2_02; rs1800451)
    G/G (non-C/non-C) 479 (97.0) 1.0 (referent) 91 (57.2) 1.0 (referent)
    G/A (non-C/C) 14 (2.8) 1.09 (0.44 to 2.67) .18 58 (36.5) 0.84 (0.53 to 1.33) .42
    A/A (C/C) 1 (0.2) 10 (6.3) 1.09 (0.42 to 2.83) .88
*

RR = risk ratio; CI = confidence interval; SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism; – = insufficient data.

Risk ratio of lung cancer death was adjusted for sex, stage (III–IV versus I–II), age at diagnosis, current smoking status, and pack-years of smoking.

A Cox proportional hazards test was used. All statistical tests were two-sided.

§

A dominant model was assumed.