. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 4.

Published in final edited form as: Anal Biochem. 2017 Aug 10;536:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.08.003

Table 4.

The top 5 tRFs in each of the urine samples as determined by percent of total annotated reads.

_{Patient Sample #}╲^{Top5 tRF}	1	2	3	4	5
1	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
2	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
3	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
4	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
5	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
6	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
7	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His
8	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His

_{Patient Sample #}╲^{Top5 tRF}	1	2	3	4	5
1	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
2	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
3	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
4	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
5	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
6	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
7	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His
8	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His

_{Patient Sample #}╲^{Top5 tRF}	1	2	3	4	5
1	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
2	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
3	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
4	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
5	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
6	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
7	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His
8	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His

_{Patient Sample #}╲^{Top5 tRF}	1	2	3	4	5
1	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
2	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
3	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
4	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
5	Glu	Gly	Lys	Val	His
6	Gly	Glu	Val	Lys	His
7	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His
8	Gly	Glu	Lys	Val	His