Abstract
The mammalian cochlea contains two types of mechanosensory hair cells (HCs) that play different and critical roles in hearing. Inner hair cells (IHCs), with an elaborate presynaptic apparatus, signal to cochlear neurons and communicate sound information to the brain. Outer hair cells (OHCs) mechanically amplify sound-induced vibrations, enabling enhanced sensitivity to sound and sharp tuning. Cochlear HCs are solely generated during development and their death, most often of OHCs, is the main cause of deafness. OHCs and IHCs, together with supporting cells, originate embryonically from the prosensory region of the otocyst, but how HCs differentiate into two different types is unknown1–3. Here we show that Insm1, which encodes a zinc finger protein transiently expressed in nascent OHCs, consolidates their fate by preventing trans-differentiation into IHCs. In the absence of INSM1 many HCs born embryonically as OHCs switch fates to become mature IHCs. In order to identify the genetic mechanisms by which Insm1 operates, we compared transcriptomes of immature IHCs vs OHCs, as well as OHCs with and without INSM1. OHCs lacking INSM1 upregulate a set of genes, most of which are normally preferentially expressed by IHCs. The homeotic cell transformation of OHCs without INSM1 into IHCs reveals for the first time a mechanism by which these neighboring mechanosensory cells begin to differ: INSM1 represses a core set of early IHC-enriched genes in embryonic OHCs and makes them unresponsive to an IHC-inducing gradient, so that they proceed to mature as OHCs. Without INSM1, some of the OHCs upregulating these few IHC-enriched transcripts trans-differentiate into IHCs, revealing the first candidate genes for IHC-specific differentiation.
OHCs express Insm1 transiently from the onset of differentiation (E15.5) to ~P24. Neuronal progenitors and nascent spiral ganglion (SG) neurons also express Insm14. Because Insm1 complete knockouts die embryonically by E19.55,6 we generated an allele (Insm1F) in which the entire coding sequence may be deleted (Fig 1a, Extended Fig 1). We conditionally ablated Insm1F with Atoh1Cre, expressed starting at E13.5, three days before Insm1, and recombining in most cochlear hair cells (HCs) and some supporting cells (SCs), but not in SG neurons7. We also ablated Insm1F with TgPax2Cre, expressed earlier in the otocyst and recombining in most inner ear cells8. In these mice, Insm1 was ablated prior to its expression in OHCs (Extended Fig 2). Both Atoh1Cre/+; Insm1F/F and TgPax2Cre/+; Insm1F/F (cKO) mice displayed ABR threshold shifts that can be accounted for by DPOAE shifts, a characteristic of OHC dysfunction (Fig 1b-d; extended Fig 3a,b). In their organs of Corti, many cells in the position of OHCs (the outer compartment) had IHC rather than OHC features. They had large stereocilia like IHCs and not the shorter, W-arranged stereocillia of OHCs (Fig 1e,f); expressed the IHC-enriched calcium buffer calmodulin and lacked OHC-specific oncomodulin (Fig 1e,f,h;extended Fig 3f); expressed the vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGLUT3), required for IHC presynaptic function, and lacked prestin, required for OHC electromotility (Fig 1g,m); had the flask shape of IHCs rather than the cylindrical of OHCs; had large nuclei like IHCs instead of the smaller of OHCs (Fig 1i-j;extended Fig 3j). These nuclei harbored transcription factor CtBP2 normally expressed in IHCs (Fig 1k), and the cells contained a number of presynaptic ribbon synapses (10.6 ± 2.1 SD, n=3 mice, 39 cells) closer to that of control IHCs (16.3 ± 0.7 SD on average, n=3 littermate controls, 30 cells), instead of the few of OHCs (1.8 ± 0.2 SD, n=3 mice, 90 cells) (Fig 1k). With rare exceptions (Fig 1g), these abnormal cells displayed all IHC features examined and lacked those of OHCs, so we termed them oc-IHCs (outer compartment IHCs).
The number of oc-IHCs in Atoh1Cre/+; Insm1F/F (42.6% ± 10.9 SD, n=12 mice) and TgPax2Cre/+; Insm1F/F (46.0% ± 5.64 SD, n=3 mice) was about half, the rest appearing as OHCs. This is not due to incomplete or delayed ablation of Insm1 because we did not detect Insm1 mRNA in any OHCs of TgPax2Cre/+; Insm1F/F mice during or after the onset of expression (E16.5; Extended Fig 2a,b, bottom). Notably, the oc-IHCs were more frequent in the first than second and third HC rows of the outer compartment (Fig 1l,n). In principle these oc-IHCs in mature organs of Corti lacking INSM1 could be displaced IHCs, newly generated IHCs replacing lost OHCs, IHCs born in the outer compartment, or OHCs trans-differentiated into IHCs. They were not displaced IHCs, as the IHC row in both cKO mice had a normal arrangement and density of IHCs (Extended Figs 4a,3c). Although during normal development cochlear HCs are all born during embryogenesis (E12-E169,10), early HC death can trigger the generation of HCs from proliferating and trans-differentiating SCs in the early postnatal days11–15. This does not occur in the absence of INSM1, as HC density in the outer compartment (OHCs + oc-IHCs) is unaltered up to P34 (Extended Figs 4b,c,3d,e), whereas oc-IHCs are present well before. Second, postnatally produced HCs derived from SCs initially express SOX212–14, whereas none of the oc-HCs of cKO pups expressed SOX2 (Extended Fig 4d). Third, some postnatally produced HCs result from proliferation of SCs11–14, yet none of the oc-HCs in cKO mice derived from postnatal proliferations (Extended Fig 4e). These results reveal that oc-IHCs are not the result of OHC death followed by replacement from displaced IHCs or postnatally generated HCs. Instead, the oc-IHCs represent a homeotic transformation (of mechanosensory OHCs into IHCs) due to a developmental defect in the generation or differentiation of OHCs. Either IHCs are generated in place of OHCs, or OHCs trans-differentiate into IHCs.
We examined organs of Corti from conditional (TgPax2Cre/+; Insm1F/F and Atoh1Cre/+; Insm1F/F) and complete (Insm1GFP.Cre/-) KOs of Insm1 during late embryogenesis, when OHCs and IHCs begin to differentiate. At E16.5, all cells in the outer compartment begin to express the earliest markers of OHCs: the Insm1 promoter in Insm1GFP.Cre/- embryos (which lack INSM1 protein but express GFP from the Insm1 promoter4; Fig 2a), and BCL11B in nuclei (Fig 2b,c). While in control mice BCL11B expression is maintained past birth, in embryos lacking INSM1 it subsides in nearly half of the oc-HCs (from E18.5 to P2; Fig 2b-c). During the same period many oc-HCs express the early IHC marker fgf8 (Fig 2d). Around birth two additional markers begin to be expressed in control mice, neuroplastin preferentially in OHC stereocillia16 and VGLUT3 in IHCs17. By comparison, in both cKOs many oc-HCs expressed VGLUT3 and not neuroplastin (Fig 2f,g). Finally, although the orientation of IHCs vs OHCs is maintained by birth in cKOs, the disorganization of the OHC rows at the level of the nuclei already revealed alterations in cell shape (Fig 2e). We conclude that in the absence of INSM1, oc-HCs are generated with early OHC features, but soon after some of these cells lose them, express early IHC markers, and proceed to differentiate into mature IHCs. This trans-differentiation of early OHCs into IHCs reveals that INSM1 is not required to initiate commitment to the OHC fate, but acts subsequently by preventing it from switching to that of IHCs. Insm1 acts by consolidating the OHC fate, making it permanent.
A brief expression of Insm1 is sufficient to evade phenotypic conversion (Extended Fig 5). It appears that Insm1 locks the OHC fate during a narrow developmental period. Curiously, despite complete absence of Insm1 expression in KO OHCs since their birth, less than half of them will trans-differentiate into IHCs. This trans-differentiation in TgPax2Cre/+; Insm1F/F and Atoh1Cre/+; Insm1F/F mice is more frequent in HC rows closer to the IHCs and less further away (Fig 1l,n). This distribution reveals the existence of a gradient in the neural to abneural axis of the organ of Corti regulating cochlear HC types. This gradient could be inducing IHC-differentiation, and INSM1 acting by preventing embryonic OHCs from responding to it.
In other developing cell types, INSM1 functions as a transcriptional activator or repressor18–24. We hypothesized that Insm1 directs OHCs to develop differentially from IHCs by activating OHC-specific genes or inhibiting IHC-specific genes. We first determined which genes are expressed in either differentiating HC type, when Insm1 is expressed (Fig 3), and then searched for genes regulated by INSM1 in developing OHCs (Fig 4). For both approaches we used Insm1GFP.Cre, in which the coding sequence of Insm1 is replaced by that of a fusion protein between GFP and the Cre recombinase, thereby serving as a reporter as well as a null allele4,23. We generated Insm1GFP.Cre/+; Atoh1A1GFP/+; R26R tdTomato/+ mice, in which all HCs express GFP (starting at E13.5 from Atoh1A1GFP and, in OHCs, from Insm1GFP.Cre) but only OHCs also express tdTomato following Insm1GFP.Cre expression (throughout the cochlea by E18.54; Fig 3a,b). We used these mice to sort OHCs and IHCs from neonatal (P0, ~E19.5) organs of Corti ((Fig 3c). With fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) we collected pools of IHC and OHCs RNAs (Fig 3d) and by RNA-seq obtained their transcriptomes (Supplementary table 1). We thus identified 922 IHC-enriched genes and 676 OHC-enriched genes (Fig 3e, supplementary tables 1–3). Among these are the 12 genes previously shown to be expressed preferentially in early IHCs or OHCs4,17,25–29 (Fig 3e), indicating that our approach detects most differentially-expressed genes. A concern was whether genes with small expression differences (≤2×, e.g. Zmat3), or detected at very low levels in one cell type only (e.g., Sox18 and Msx1), were truly differentially expressed. We selected 21 transcripts (Fig 3e), and tested by RT-qPCR for differential expression using additional IHC and OHC RNA pools. All 21 genes were confirmed to be differentially expressed, and the differences in expression were similar whether estimated by RNA-seq or RT-qPCR (Fig 3f). We also confirmed differential expression of additional genes by methods not susceptible to potential artifacts of cell sorting and mRNA detection: Bcl11b in OHCs by immunohistochemistry (Fig 2b); Insm2 in OHCs with an Insm2LacZ mouse line (Fig 3e inset); and other genes by in situ hybridization (ISH) as preferentially expressed in OHCs (Neurod6, Sez6l) or IHCs (Tbx2, Id4, Rprm, Smad3, Car13, Brip1, Lrrn1, Pink1) (Fig 4g-o). All the above attests to the low prevalence of false positives among the genes we estimated as differentially-expressed between immature IHCs and OHCs.
The transcriptomes of perinatal cochlear hair vs SCs have been obtained, but these included a mixture of both OHCs and IHCs25,26. Although cell-type specific transcriptomes of mature IHCs and OHCs, obtained with microarray, were also reported30, ours are the first transcriptomes of these cell types prior to maturity, during early differentiation. A comparison among differentiating vs mature IHC- or OHC-enriched genes reveals very little overlap (Fig 3g and supplementary table 4): only 5.9% IHC-enriched and 2% OHC-enriched genes are differentially expressed at both differentiating and mature stages. These include some known genes characteristic of the mature stage (Vglut3 and Otof in IHCs and Prestin in OHCs) but whose expression is incipient at birth. However, the vast majority of the genes preferentially expressed in either cell type during differentiation (like Insm1, Insm2 and Bcl11b in OHCs; and Brip1, Car13 and Fgf8 in IHCs), are not expressed upon maturation, and vice versa. These results reveal that a complex transcriptome, involving hundreds of genes, is transiently active during OHC- and IHC-specific differentiation. It is in this genetic context that INSM1 locks the fate of OHCs so that they proceed to differentiate into mature OHCs and not IHCs.
To explore how INSM1 drives OHC differentiation, we looked by RNAseq for genes differentially expressed in differentiating OHCs with and without INSM1 (Insm1GFP.Cre/+ vs Insm1GFP.Cre/-) (extended Fig 6, Fig 4a, supplementary table 5). We identified 31 to 331 genes that could be differentially expressed, either up- or down-regulated by Insm1 (supplementary tables 6, 7). Comparing these genes with those normally enriched in OHCs or IHCs (Fig 4b-e), combined with RT-qPCR retesting (supplementary table 8) and ISH (Figs 4f-o), reveals that in OHCs Insm1 is not activating OHC genes but inhibiting IHC genes. No upregulated genes were confirmed by RT-qPCR and, of the 22 down-regulated genes confirmed, 21 are normally preferentially expressed by IHCs. The enrichment of these genes in wild type IHCs is similar to their upregulation in OHCs lacking INSM1 (Fig 4f,g, extended table 1). By contrast, most genes differentially expressed in OHCs vs IHCs were not affected by Insm1. We conclude that INSM1 down-regulates a specific subset of IHC-enriched genes in embryonic OHCs; without INSM1, those genes are expressed in embryonic OHCs, nearly half of which transdifferentiate into IHCs.
At E18.5, OHCs lacking INSM1 have not upregulated most of the early IHC-specific genes and still express early OHC-specific genes (Fig 4f), even though many of these cells will, once differentiated, express all examined features and markers of IHC and none of OHCs (Fig 1e-k,m, extended Fig 3f). The small set of early IHC-specific genes (21/922, ~2%) upregulated in embryonic OHCs lacking INSM1 likely represent an early step in the genetic cascade leading to their complete transformation into IHCs. Since oc-HCs expressing these few genes differentiate as IHCs, these genes are likely required for IHC differentiation. Hence, in addition to identifying Insm1 as a critical gene for OHC differentiation, our results also identify the first candidate genes regulating the specific differentiation of IHCs. Because all OHCs express Insm1, yet in its absence less than half trans-differentiate into IHCs, we expected two patterns of miss-expression by ISH (Fig 4g-o,g). Some genes were upregulated in all OHCs lacking INSM1, as expected if repressed by INSM1. These (Rprm, Id4, Lrrn1, Car13, Pink1 and Brip1; Fig 4h-n) must include the genes whose disinhibition in the absence of INSM1 renders embryonic OHCs susceptible to the gradient that induces IHC trans-differentiation. Other genes (Fgf8 andTbx2; Figs 2d,4o) were only upregulated in less than half of oc-HCs, presumably those trans-differentiating into IHCs. These genes are some of the earliest expressed in IHCs, and likely include regulators of IHC differentiation.
Our results reveal a homeotic transformation of OHCs into IHCs in the absence of INSM1, identify the genes initially miss-regulated by ablation of Insm1, and provide a genetic mechanism for how these two cell types differentiate: nascent OHCs transiently express Insm1, which represses (directly or indirectly) a core set of early IHC-specific genes and renders the cells insensitive to an IHC-inducing gradient; this consolidates the fate of OHCs by preventing their trans-differentiation into IHCs.
Materials and Methods
Ethics
All animal care and procedures were in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health and were approved by Northwestern University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Animal Study Protocols IS00001281 and IS00000593).
Generation of the Insm1 floxed allele for conditional ablation
The Insm1 targeting construct was generated using a genomic BAC clone, 439G2, from the mouse 129/SvEv genomic BAC library, RPCI-22. The Insm1 gene, including the coding sequence, 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs), a 2,790bp 5’ homologous sequence and a 4,098 bp 3’ homologous sequence, was subcloned into the pL253 vector (IA1-pL253) using recombineering as described in31. The recombined clone, IA1-pL253 was further modified using recombineering to add a LoxP recombination site immediately downstream of the 5’UTR but before the Kozak sequence. A second Frt-NEO-Frt-LoxP site was recombined immediately downstream of the 3’UTR. The completed targeting vector was sequence verified and sent to the Northwestern Transgenic and Targeted Mutagenesis Laboratory (Chicago, IL) for electroporation into SvEv 129 mouse embryonic stem cells.
Using Q5 High-Fidelity Polymerase with GC Enhancer (NEB Catalog:M0491) and the primers: WT = TCTTAGATTCTGCCCTTTCTGACAG, CKO = CCAAGGAGATGACCACGCATAG, R2 = CTCTTGTAGGGCCTCCTGTG, we performed a PCR to identify recombinant clones. Conditions for Thermal-cycler are: Step 1: 98°C, 3:00 minutes, Step 2: 98°C, 0:10 minutes, Step 3: 65°C, 0:30 minutes, −1deg/cycle, Step 4: 72°C, 6:45 minutes, Repeat Step 2, 10×, Step 5: 98°C, 0:10 minutes, Step 6: 60°C, 0:30 minutes, Step 7: 72°C, 6:45 minutes, Repeat step 5, 25X, Step 8: 72°C, 10:00 minutes, Step 9: 4°C. Expected sizes for wild type allele using primers WT to R2 was 6163 bps. Expected size for recombinant clones using CKO-Reverse was 6145 bps. We screened a total of 439 clones and identified 5 recombinants.
We further screened these 5 ES cell clones for recombination upstream of the 5’ LoxP site. DNA from selected recombinant clones was digested with the restriction enzyme, SpeI (NEB Cat:R0133) and homologous recombination was confirmed by Southern hybridization. DNA was visualized using a 168 bp radiolabeled probe (as described in6). The expected band sizes for wild type and conditional knockout alleles are 18,162 bps and 14,333 bps, respectively. All 5 ES clones contained a targeted allele of Insm1.
These clones were used for the generation of mosaic embryos and implantation into surrogate mothers by the Northwestern Transgenic and Targeted Mutagenesis Laboratory (Chicago, IL). From one of these clones (B3) we generated first chimeric mice, which were mated to mice expressing the FlpE recombinase (B6-Tg(CAG-FLPe)3632 to deleted the NEO cassette flanked by FRT sites and thus generate mice with a floxed allele of Insm1.
Hearing Tests
During testing, mice of both sexes aged P25 to P31 were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (120 mg/kg; 10 mg/kg, IP) and their body temperature maintained using a heating blanket. In order to assay OHC function, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were recorded using a custom probe equipped with a sensitive microphone (Knowles Electronics, FG-3652-CX). Responses were analyzed using Emission Averager (EMAV)33. Because the probe can be placed close to the eardrum, sound calibrations in the ear canal of each mouse were performed out to 48 kHz using a chirp stimulus generated in System Response (SysRes)34. All signals were generated using a CardDeluxe 24-bit sound card with a sampling rate of 96 kHz. Iso-input functions (f2/f1=1.2) at L1=50; L2=35 dB were recorded for f2 frequencies between 2 and 47 kHz, thereby covering most of the mouse audiogram. Input-output functions were also acquired for various f2 frequencies (6, 12, 27 kHz), where L1=L2+10dB. Thresholds for 2f1-f2 were then calculated and represent the level of f1 producing a DPOAE of 0 dB. After emission testing, neural responses were measured by collecting auditory brainstem responses (ABR) using tone-burst stimuli. Threshold was determined by noting the level at which the ABR waveform disappeared into the noise. For these experiments, sound calibration was obtained using a real pinna coupler35.Further details are provided in a previous publication36.
Tissue Collection and Preparation
For neonates, animals were euthanized by decapitation, and cochleae dissected in cold HBSS with calcium and magnesium (Gibco). For embryos, time pregnant dams were euthanized by isoflurane overdose followed by cervical dislocation. Their abdomens were opened to expose the uterus which was dissected in cold HBSS with calcium and magnesium (Gibco) and embryos harvested, and cochleae retrieved. After dissection, neonatal and embryonic cochleae were processed depending on future use. For immunohistochemistry, embryonic and neonatal cochleae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 hours at room temperature. For older tissues (>P20), the animals were cardiac-perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde, cochleae dissected, and post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 hours at room temperature. Cochleae from animals older than P5 were decalcified in 10% EDTA, pH 7.4, at 4˚C until needed. Organs of Corti were dissected out from the cochleae into one apical, two middle and one basal sections using a whole mount surface preparation method37. Frozen sections were processed as described in4.
Immunohistochemistry
Whole mount organ of Corti sections were processed for immunohistochemistry as described previously38. Primary antibodies were mouse-anti-calmodulin (1:100, C-7055, Sigma Aldridge), goat-anti-oncomodulin (1:200, sc-7446, Santa Cruz), rabbit-anti-prestin (1:1000, from J Zheng, Northwestern University), guinea pig-anti-VGLUT3 (1:2500, from Robert Edwards, University of California, San Francisco), mouse-anti-CtBP2 (1:400, 612044, BD Biosciences), rabbit-anti-myosin7a (1:800, 25–6790, Proteus Biosciences), sheep-anti-neuroplastin (1:150, AF7818, R&D SYSTEMS), mouse-anti-BCL11B (1:400, ab18465, abcam), goat-anti-SOX2 (1:500, sc-17320, Santa Cruz). For BCL11B immune-labelling on whole mount cochlea, we performed antigen retrieval by incubating samples in 10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6 with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 20 minutes at 92°C and cooling for 30 minutes at room temperature prior to blocking. For CtBP2 and SOX2 immuno-labelling, samples were prepared using a freeze-thaw method. In brief, organ of Corti sections were incubated in 30% sucrose at room temperature for 20 minutes, put in −80°C for 5 minutes, thawed at room temperature for 20 minutes and rinsed off sucrose with PBS before blocking and incubating with primary antibodies at 37°C overnight. Nuclei were counterstained with 1:1000 DAPI or 1:2000 Hoechst 33342.
X-gal staining to detect β-galactosidase expression on sections of Insm2LacZ embryos was performed as described39.
Cell Proliferation Assay
In order to label hair and supporting cells generated from progenitors proliferating postnatally, neonates were injected twice daily from P0-P5 with the thymidine analog 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU; 50mg/kg in sterile saline). EdU incorporation into DNA was detected using Click-iT® Plus EdU Alexa Fluor® 555 Imaging Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Following EdU detection, the samples were immune-labelled with antibodies as described above.
Image acquisition and analysis
We acquired images on either a Nikon A1 or A1R+ Confocal imaging system using a 100× objective. Three-dimensional renderings were generated using NIS Elements AR4.60.00 (Nikon) and Imaris X64 8.4.1 (BitPlane) software. Nuclear and ribbon synapse measurements were performed using built-in analysis functions on Imaris. Post-acquisition, we identically processed image pairs of control and knockout samples. This included adjustment for brightness, contrast and parameters for 3D volume and surface renderings of all images.
Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
For collecting OHCs or IHCs, organs of Corti were dissected from E18.5 embryos (Insm1GFP.Cre/- or Insm1GFP.Cre/+) or P0 neonates (Insm1GFP.Cre/+; Atoh1A1GFP/+; R26RtdTomato/+) in ice-cold HBSS with calcium and magnesium (Gibco). A portion of tail from each embryo and neonate was collected for genotyping. Organs of Corti were washed three times in cold 1×PBS and then they were digested in 0.33U/ml papain, 0.5mM EDTA and 1mM L-cystine in EBSS for 10 minutes at 37°C, rinsed 3 times in 2% FBS and mechanically dissociated by gentle trituration (~100–150× with a P1000 pipet). Cell suspensions were kept on ice until FACS sorting on a BD FACS Aria 4 flow cytometer through a 100 μm nozzle at speed 2 (<100 events/sec). Hair cell populations were collected into RLT buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA was then isolated from cells using Qiagen RNeasy Plus Micro Kit or cells were stored at −80˚C until RNA isolation. Isolated RNA was evaluated for quality and concentration on BioAnylizer and stored at −80˚C.
qRT-PCR
RT-PCR was performed using either SYBR® Green or TaqMan systems. Total RNA was extracted from pools of HCs collected from E18.5 Insm1GFP.Cre/-, E18.5 Insm1GFP.Cre/+, and P0 Insm1GFP.Cre/+; Atoh1A1GFP/+; R26RtdTomato/+ animals through FACS. RNA extraction was done using RNeasy® Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality was determined with a BioAnalyzer through NUSeq Core Facility, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
For SYBR® Green qRT-PCR, we used ~3000pg of total RNA from each HC pool for first strand cDNA synthesis using iScript™ reverse transcription supermix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s manual. We then performed RT-qPCR with ~200pg of first strand cDNA using SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) in triplicates on a CFX Connect™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using a 40-cycle protocol.
For TaqMan qRT-PCR, we used 1ug total RNA from each HC pool for first strand cDNA synthesis using SuperScript® VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit with ezDNase™ Enzyme (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First strand cDNA was subjected to ezDNase™ inactivation using 1ul of 100mM DTT per reaction. Prior to qRT-PCR, we performed pre-amplification of first strand cDNA using TaqMan® PreAmp Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We then performed qRT-PCR using 1ug of diluted pre-amplified cDNA (1:20 in TE buffer) per reaction in triplicates on a QuantStudio™ 7 flex Real-Time system (Applied Biosystems) using a 14-cycle protocol at NUSeq Core Facility, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
All primers used for qRT-PCR in this study were designed and pre-mixed to their optimal concentrations by BioRad and Applied Biosystems. qRT-PCR reactions were performed according to the corresponding manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA-Seq and transcriptome analysis of embryonic OHCs and P0 HCs
To purify enough RNA for deep sequencing and also analyze results statistically, or the determination of the IHC and OHC transcriptomes we collected by FACS six separate pools of IHCs (700–1100 cells per pool) and six of OHCs (2800–3700 cells per pool) from Insm1GFP.Cre/+; Atoh1A1GFP/+; R26RtdTomato/+ at P0 (generated by timed pregnancies and found to correspond in most cases to E19.5 and in the rest to E20.5). For the determination of the transcriptomes of OHCs with and without INSM1 we collected OHCs by FACS into three separate pools per genotype (Insm1GFP.Cre/- and Insm1GFP.Cre/+), each with 2200 to 5000 OHCs from 8 to 12 E18.5 embryos. We extracted 3 to 7.5 ng of RNA per E18.5 OHC pool, and ~3 ng for P0 IHC and 10–18 ng P0 OHC pools. We only used samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) >8.
Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) performed sample preparation and sequencing at their facility in the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). The total RNA samples were first treated with DNase I to degrade any possible DNA contamination followed by ribosomal RNA removal using RiboZero (Epicentre), converted it to cDNA and amplified with NuGEN Ovation® RNA-Amplification System V2. Mixed with the fragmentation buffer, the mRNA was fragmented into short fragments of about 200 bp. Then the first strand of cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer-primer. Buffer, dNTPs, RNase H, and DNA polymerase I were added to synthesize the second strand. Double stranded cDNA was purified with magnetic beads, performed end reparation and 3’-end single nucleotide A (adenine) addition, and ligated sequencing adaptors to the fragments, which were enriched by PCR amplification. Libraries were qualified and quantified with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR. Individually barcoded 100 bp paired-end library products were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2000 (3 libraries from E18.5 Insm1GFP.Cre/- and 3 from Insm1GFP.Cre/+ OHCs) or the HiSeq4000 (6 IHC plus 6 OHC libraries from P0 Insm1GFP.Cre/+; Atoh1A1GFP/+; R26RtdTomato/+), multiplexed per lane, yielding 48–50 million (for each of the 6 E18.5 OHC libraries) and 92–116 million (for each of the 12 P0 IHC or OHC libraries) paired reads. DNA read quality was evaluated in fastq format using FastQC, adapters were trimmed, and reads of poor quality or aligning to rRNA sequences were filtered.
The cleaned reads were aligned to the Mus musculus genome (mm10) using STAR40. Read counts for each gene were calculated using htseq-count41 in conjunction with a gene annotation file for mm10 obtained from UCSC (University of California Santa Cruz; http://genome.ucsc.edu). Differential expression was determined using DESeq242. The cutoff for determining significantly differentially expressed genes was an FDR-adjusted p-value less than 0.05.
Extended Data
Extended Table 1: Confirmed genes missregulated in OHC lacking INSM1.
GeneSymbol | Description | RNAseq Change (IHC/OHC) | RNAseq Change (KO/Het | RT-qPCR Change (KO/Het) | RT-qPCR p-value (KO/Het) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tbx2 | T-box 2 | 19.28 | 13.75 | 102.31 | 0.000428 |
Fgf8 | fibroblast growth factor 8 | 18.02 | 8.12 | 65.08 | 0.004112 |
Smad3 | SMAD family member 3 | 10.69 | 14.04 | 46.43 | 4.14E-05 |
Nhs | Nance-Horan syndrome (human) | 8.01 | 11.56 | 3.15 | 0.034775 |
Lrrnl | leucine rich repeat protein 1, neuronal | 7.86 | 4.93 | 7.79 | 0.003956 |
Bripl | BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 | 7.47 | 12.65 | 118.50 | 5.53E-05 |
Rin3 | Ras and Rab interactor 3 | 5.71 | 10.98 | 1.88 | 0.011625 |
Pcdhl | protocadherin 1 | 4.47 | 3.53 | 2.84 | 0.009309 |
Spryd3 | SPRY domain containing 3 | 3.64 | 6.70 | 1.53 | 0.033057 |
Pacsl | phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 1 | 3.56 | 2.63 | 2.33 | 0.00229 |
Carl3 | carbonic anhydrase 13 | 3.55 | 4.27 | 3.69 | 0.003681 |
Tmprss7 | transmembrane serine protease 7 | 3.03 | 3.07 | 1.58 | 0.033105 |
Rprm | reprimo, TP53 dependent G2 arrest mediator candidate | 2.89 | 1.83 | 1.67 | 0.039198 |
Zfp668 | zinc finger protein 668 | 1.85 | 3.23 | 1.30 | 0.044668 |
Mtssl | metastasis suppressor 1 | 1.83 | 2.34 | 1.56 | 0.02911 |
Cuxl | cut-like homeobox 1 | 1.61 | 2.05 | 1.57 | 0.026945 |
Lrrc8b | leucine rich repeat containing 8family, member B | 1.56 | 1.71 | 1.31 | 0.045587 |
Rail | retinoic acid induced 1 | 1.57 | 2.56 | 1.14 | 0.033262 |
Pinkl | PTEN induced putative kinase 1 | 1.36 | 6.52 | 4.42 | 0.003253 |
Cmtm8 | CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing 8 | 1.21 | 8.29 | 1.84 | 0.002469 |
Id4 | inhibitor of DNA binding 4 | 0.99 | 1.94 | 1.84 | 0.063034 |
Sez6l | seizure related 6 homolog like | 0.23 | 7.47 | 5.04 | 0.020066 |
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
NU core facilities used were TTML (CA60553), CAM (CA060553), FC (CA060553) and NUSeq. We thank A. Groves for protocols and advice, D. He for original databases of microarray results. Supported by NIH Grants DC015903, DC000089 and DC012483.
Footnotes
Data Availability All data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. RNAseq data available for public view at the gEAR portal (https://umgear.org/).
Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
Bibliography for main text
- 1.Puligilla C & Kelley MW Building the world’s best hearing aid; regulation of cell fate in the cochlea. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19, 368–373 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Groves AK, Zhang KD & Fekete DM The genetics of hair cell development and regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 36, 361–381 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Basch ML, Brown RM, Jen H-I & Groves AK Where hearing starts: the development of the mammalian cochlea. J Anat 228, 233–254 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lorenzen SM, Duggan A, Osipovich AB, Magnuson MA & García-Añoveros J Insm1 promotes neurogenic proliferation in delaminated otic progenitors. Mech Dev 138 Pt 3, 233–245 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gierl MS, Karoulias N, Wende H, Strehle M & Birchmeier C The zinc-finger factor Insm1 (IA-1) is essential for the development of pancreatic beta cells and intestinal endocrine cells. Genes Dev 20, 2465–2478 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rosenbaum JN, Duggan A & García-Añoveros J Insm1 promotes the transition of olfactory progenitors from apical and proliferative to basal, terminally dividing and neuronogenic. Neural Dev 6, 6 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang H, Xie X, Deng M, Chen X & Gan L Generation and characterization of Atoh1-Cre knock-in mouse line. Genesis 48, 407–413 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ohyama T & Groves AK Generation of Pax2-Cre mice by modification of a Pax2 bacterial artificial chromosome. Genesis 38, 195–199 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ruben RJ Development of the inner ear of the mouse: a radioautographic study of terminal mitoses. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 220:1–44 (1967). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen P & Segil N p27(Kip1) links cell proliferation to morphogenesis in the developing organ of Corti. Development 126, 1581–1590 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kelley MW, Talreja DR & Corwin JT Replacement of hair cells after laser microbeam irradiation in cultured organs of corti from embryonic and neonatal mice. J Neurosci 15, 3013–3026 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cox BC et al. Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo. Development 141, 816–829 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bramhall NF, Shi F, Arnold K, Hochedlinger K & Edge ASB Lgr5-positive supporting cells generate new hair cells in the postnatal cochlea. Stem Cell Reports 2, 311–322 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hu L et al. Diphtheria Toxin-Induced Cell Death Triggers Wnt-Dependent Hair Cell Regeneration in Neonatal Mice. J Neurosci 36, 9479–9489 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.White PM, Doetzlhofer A, Lee YS, Groves AK & Segil N Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells. Nature 441, 984–987 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mburu P et al. Whirlin complexes with p55 at the stereocilia tip during hair cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 10973–10978 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Flores EN et al. A non-canonical pathway from cochlea to brain signals tissue-damaging noise. Curr Biol 25, 606–612 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Breslin MB, Zhu M, Notkins AL & Lan MS Neuroendocrine differentiation factor, IA-1, is a transcriptional repressor and contains a specific DNA-binding domain: identification of consensus IA-1 binding sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 1038–1045 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jia S, Wildner H & Birchmeier C Insm1 controls the differentiation of pulmonary neuroendocrine cells by repressing Hes1. Dev Biol 408, 90–98 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lan MS & Breslin MB Structure, expression, and biological function of INSM1 transcription factor in neuroendocrine differentiation. FASEB J 23, 2024–2033 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu W-D, Wang H-W, Muguira M, Breslin MB & Lan MS INSM1 functions as a transcriptional repressor of the neuroD/beta2 gene through the recruitment of cyclin D1 and histone deacetylases. Biochem J 397, 169–177 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang H-W et al. Identification of an INSM1-binding site in the insulin promoter: negative regulation of the insulin gene transcription. J Endocrinol 198, 29–39 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Osipovich AB et al. Insm1 promotes endocrine cell differentiation by modulating the expression of a network of genes that includes Neurog3 and Ripply3. Development 141, 2939–2949 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jia S et al. Insm1 cooperates with Neurod1 and Foxa2 to maintain mature pancreatic β-cell function. EMBO J 34, 1417–1433 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cai T et al. Characterization of the transcriptome of nascent hair cells and identification of direct targets of the Atoh1 transcription factor. J Neurosci 35, 5870–5883 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Scheffer DI, Shen J, Corey DP & Chen Z-Y Gene Expression by Mouse Inner Ear Hair Cells during Development. J Neurosci 35, 6366–6380 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang T et al. Expression and localization of cabp ca2+ binding proteins in the mouse cochlea. PLoS ONE 11, e0147495 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jacques BE, Montcouquiol ME, Layman EM, Lewandoski M & Kelley MW Fgf8 induces pillar cell fate and regulates cellular patterning in the mammalian cochlea. Development 134, 3021–3029 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pirvola U et al. FGFR1 is required for the development of the auditory sensory epithelium. Neuron 35, 671–680 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu H et al. Characterization of transcriptomes of cochlear inner and outer hair cells. J Neurosci 34, 11085–11095 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bibliography for Extended Data and Methods
- 31.Liu P, Jenkins NA & Copeland NG A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res 13, 476–484 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kanki H, Suzuki H & Itohara S High-efficiency CAG-FLPe deleter mice in C57BL/6J background. Exp Anim 55, 137–141 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neely ST & Liu Z EMAV: Otoacoustic emission averager. Omaha, NE: Technical Memo No 17: Boy’s Town National Research Hospital; (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Neely ST & Stevenson R SysRes. Omaha, NE: Tech Memo No. 1: BoysTown National Research Hospital NE; (1992). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pearce M, Richter CP & Cheatham MA A reconsideration of sound calibration in the mouse. J Neurosci Methods 106, 57–67 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cheatham MA et al. Loss of the tectorial membrane protein CEACAM16 enhances spontaneous, stimulus-frequency, and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Neurosci 34, 10325–10338 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Montgomery SC & Cox BC Whole mount dissection and immunofluorescence of the adult mouse cochlea. J Vis Exp (2016). doi:10.3791/53561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Delmaghani S et al. Hypervulnerability to Sound Exposure through Impaired Adaptive Proliferation of Peroxisomes. Cell 163, 894–906 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K & Behringer R Staining Frozen Mouse Embryo Sections for {beta}-Galactosidase (lacZ) Activity. CSH Protoc 2007, pdb.prot4726 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dobin A et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Anders S, Pyl PT & Huber W HTSeq — a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Love MI, Huber W & Anders S Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15, 550–550 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Salic A & Mitchison TJ A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 2415–2420 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yang H et al. Gfi1-Cre knock-in mouse line: A tool for inner ear hair cell-specific gene deletion. Genesis 48, 400–406 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.