Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 5;18(11):1251–1259. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30423-7

Table 2.

TOC positive rates by arm in intent to treat, sensitivity and stratified analyses (n=623)

7 daydose Single-dose 7 day-dose vs. single-dose rate difference (95% C.I.) Relative Risk (95% C.I.) Multi- vs. Single p-value*
Primary outcome T. vaginalis per NAAT or Culture
Overall per ITT 34/312
(10·9%)
58/311
(18·6%)
−7·8 (−2·2 to −13·3) 0·55 (0·34 −0·70) 0.001
Among those with BV at baseline 16/125
(12·8%)
26/125
(20·8%)
−8·0 (−12·8 to −20·8) 0·59 (0·43–0·80) 0·001
Among those without BV at baseline 13/139
(9·4%)
24/140
(17·1%)
−7·8 (−0·2 to −15·8) 0·57 (0·45–0·71) 0·001
Sensitivity Analyses
All missing reclassified as negative 29/312
(9·3%)
51/311
(16·4%)
−7·1 (−1·9 to −12·4) 0·57 (0·45–0·71) 0·001
All missing reclassified as positive 71/312
(22·8%)
92/311
(29·6%)
−6·8 (−0·1 to −13·7) 0·77 (0·70–0·85) 0·001
Culture as outcome m-
ITT***
22/269
(8·2%)
41/270
(15·2%)
−7·0 (−1·3 to −12·7) 0·54 (0·39–0·75) 0·001
Overall NAAT or culture as outcome m-ITT*** 29/270
(10·7%)
51/270
(18·9%)
−8·2 (−2·2 to −14·1) 0·57 (0·45–0·71) 0·001
*

Relative Risks and p-values from GEE analysis clustering by site.

**

missing data imputed using multiple imputations using fully conditional specification

***

m-ITT (modified ITT using complete case as denominator)