Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 1;8(4):403–408.

Table 2.

The effect of electromagnetic fields (EMF) by Mobile Phone Jammers on blood factors in immature rats.

Sample Size Control Mean±SD Sham Mean±SD Exposed Mean±SD Sig (P-Value)
PLT ( x103/µl) 10 777.30±266.45 b 721.20±89.29 b 361.30±216.35 a 0.000
MCHC (g/dL) 10 33.49±1.06 b 32.15±0.60 a,b 11.38±33.33 a 0.027
RDWCV 10 13.42±1.14 a 12.63±0.66 a 18.94±0.76 b 0.000
LYM (cell /µL) 10 76.48±9.15 a 84.77±3.01 b 85.36±2.70 b 0.004
Hgb (g/dL) 10 15.20±1.19 a 15.86±0.66 a 15.39±2.16 a 0.596
Hct =(%) 10 45.33±2.53 a 49.35±1.49 a 49.60±6.32 a 0.043
WBC (103 cell/µL) 10 10.41±4.61 a 15.41±5.53 a 14.13±38.87 a 0.003
RBC (106 cell/µL) 10 6.55±3.07 a 8.20±0.30 a 8.21±1.04 a 0.093

PLT = platelet count (x103/µl); LYM = lymphocyte count (cell /µL); MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (g/dL); RDWCV = red blood cell distribution width; Hgb = hemoglobin; WBC = white blood cell count; RBC = red blood cell count; Hct = (% Hematocrit level)