Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;16(4):371–375. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-4-371

Table 1.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI modalities.

Technique Participants (n) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Abnormal putaminal T2 hypointensity MSA-P (24) vs PD (27) 87.5 88.89
Proton density putaminal hyperintensity MSA-P (24) vs PD (27) 83.3 100
T1 MRI: midbrain superior profile PSP (25) vs PD (27) 68 88.8
T1 MRI: midbrain atrophy PSP (25) vs PD (27) 68 77.7
T2 MRI: tegmental hyperintensity PSP (25) vs PD (27) 28 100
Putaminal T2 hypointensity T2 hyperintensity combined MSA (28) vs PD (32) PSP (30) CBD (26) 32 32 32 100 93 85
Overall MRI abnormalities PD (32) vs MSA (28) PSP (30) CBD (26) 71 70 92 91 91 91
T1 MRI: voxel-based morphometry of cerebral peduncles and midbrain PSP (12) versus PD (12) 83 79
Diffusion-weighted MRI Putaminal rADC MSA-P (10) vs PD (11) 100 100
Putaminal hyperintense rim MSA-P (10) vs PD (11) 80 91
Putaminal atrophy MSA-P (10) vs PD (11) 60 100

CBD = corticobasalganglionic degeneration; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; MSA-P = multiple system atrophy parkinsonian type; PD = Parkinson’s disease; PSP = progressive supranuclear palsy; rADC = regional apparent diffusion coefficient.