Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;36(12):1981–1995. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2380-x

Table 3.

List of studies investigating the performances of BTA tests in surveillance setting in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Marker Author (year) reference Study design No. of patients Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Other end points
BTA STAT Sarosdy (1995) [25] Cohort prospective/case–control (separate) 499/564 40 96
Ianari (1997) [87] Cohort 75 54 91
Leyh (1997) [88] Cohort prospective 164 54 92
Hargreave (1997) [89] Cohort prospective 272 58 86
Sarosdy (1997) [90] Cohort retrospective/case–control (separate) 220/550 67 29-95
Serretta (2000) [77] Marker-comparison retrospective 179 57 62 PPV 40%, NPV 76.9%
Giannopoulos (2001) Marker-comparison prospective 95 72
Sarosdy (2002) [91] Cohort/case–control (separate) 438 50
Lokeshwar (2002) [24] Cohort prospective 26 61 74 PPV 88%, NPV 38%
Raitanen (2008) Cohort prospective 501 56 86
Yafi (2015) [17] Marker-comparison prospective 109 61 78
Bell (2016) [18] Marker-comparison prospective 91 No association with RFS or PFS
BTA Trak Gutierrez Banoz (1999) [92] Cohort 122 61 87
Serretta (2000) Marker-comparison retrospective 179 62 79 PPV 45.4%, NPV 88.4%
Sarosdy (2002) [91] Cohort/case–control (separate) 438 50
Fernandez Gomez (2002) [93] Cohort Unknown (700 samples) 62 68
Babjuk (2008) [22] Cohort prospective 88 54 84
Bell (2016) [18] Marker-comparison prospective 91 No association with RFS or PFS

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, RFS recurrence-free survival, PFS progression-free survival