Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jan 8;47(4):953–962. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1143-x

Table 3:

Robust Logistic Regression of Non-hormone Injection (i.e., “fillers”) Use on Participant Sociodemographics, Social Networks, and Internet Use (n = 249)

Non-Hormone Injections
Adj. OR 95% CI Sig.
Social Networks and Internet Use
   Hormone Use by Network Alters (1 unit increase = 10% increase) 1.18 0.86;1.60 p = .301
   Use of Internet to Find Trans Friends 1.43 0.65;3.16 p = .375
Age (in years)
1.08 1.05;1.11 p < .001
Racial/Ethnic Identity
   African American/Black ref. cat.
   Hispanic/Latina 4.34 1.54;12.26 p = .006
   Non-Black/Non-Hispanic 1.02 0.31;3.35 p = .970
HIV Status
   HIV Positive 0.85 0.38;1.92 p = .694
Homelessness
   Yes 1.58 0.39;6.43 p = .521
Health Insurance
   None 1.21 0.49;3.00 p = .688
Income
   Greater than the Sample Average 1.46 0.71;2.99 p = .305
   Sex Work as Main Source of Income 2.11 0.99;4.54 p = .054
Social Network Variables Interaction Effect
   Hormone Use by Network Alters * Use of Internet to Find Trans Friends 0.74 0.48;1.14 p = .176

Wald χ2(22) = 38.28; p < 0.0001; Pseudo R2 = 0.2033