Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 29;7:1725. Originally published 2018 Oct 31. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16758.2

Table 3. Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores for included studies.

Newcastle–Ottawa scale case-control studies
Comparability of cases and controls
on the basis of the design or analysis
Study ID Is the case
definition
adequate?
Are the cases
representative?
Selection
of controls
adequate
Definition
of controls
adequate
a) Study
controls for the
most important
factor
b) Study controls
for important
additional factors
Ascertainment
of exposure
adequate
Same method of
ascertainment
for cases and
controls
Non-response
rate adequate
Total
score /9
Ferencz 1980 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Gal 1972 unclear unclear yes yes yes yes yes yes unclear 6
Greenberg 1977 yes yes yes yes yes yes unclear yes yes 8
Janerich 1974 no yes yes no yes no yes yes unclear 5
Janerich 1977 yes yes unclear yes yes yes yes unclear yes 7
Hellstrom 1976 yes unclear no yes yes no unclear yes unclear 4
Lammer 1986 yes yes unclear yes yes yes yes yes no 7
Laurence 1971 yes unclear unclear yes no unclear unclear unclear unclear 2
Levy 1973 yes yes no yes yes no unclear unclear unclear 4
Nora 1975 yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes 8
Nora 1978
case control 1
yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes 8
Nora 1978
case control 2
and 3
yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes unclear 7
Polednak 1983 yes yes yes yes yes no unclear yes unclear 6
Rothman 1979 yes yes no no no yes yes yes unclear 5
Sainz 1987 unclear yes yes unclear yes yes unclear yes unclear 5
Tummler 2014 yes no no no no no no yes yes 3
Newcastle–Ottawa scale cohort studies
Comparability of cases
and controls on the
basis of the design or
analysis
Are the participants
representative
of the exposed
cohort?
Is the non-
exposed cohort
similar to the
exposed?
Is the
ascertainment
of exposure
accurate?
Is there
evidence that
the outcome
of interest was
not present at
start of study?
a) Study
controls
for the
most
important
factor
b) Study
controls for
important
additional
factors
Was the
assessment
of outcome
adequate?
Was follow-up
long enough
for outcomes
to occur?
Was there
adequacy
of follow
up of
cohorts?
Total
score /9
Fleming 1978 yes unclear unclear yes unclear unclear unclear yes unclear 3
Goujard 1979 yes yes unclear yes yes no unclear yes yes 6
Hadjigeorgiou
1982
yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes unclear 7
Haller 1974 unclear unclear unclear yes no no unclear yes unclear 2
Kullander
1976
yes yes yes yes yes unclear yes yes yes 8
Meire 1978 yes no yes yes yes no unclear yes yes 6
Michaelis 1983 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Roussel 1968 yes yes yes yes no no unclear yes yes 6
Rumeau-
Rouquette
1978
yes unclear yes yes yes yes yes yes no 7
Torfs 1981 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9