Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;41(6):631–642. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw021

Table I.

Descriptive Data on Original Sample at Time 1

Characteristic Spina bifida M ( SD ) or N (%) Typically developing M ( SD ) or N (%) Statistical test
Child age 8.34 (0.48) 8.49 (0.50) t (134) = −1.75
Maternal age 37.74 (5.19) 37.74 (4.84) t (134) = 0.00
Paternal age 41.02 (5.45) 40.63 (6.50) t (105) = 0.33
Gender
 Male 37 (54.41) 37 (54.41) χ 2 (1) = 0.00
 Female 31 (45.59) 31 (45.59)
Child ethnicity
 Caucasian 56 (82.35) 62 (91.18) χ 2 (1) = 2.30
 Other 12 (17.65) 6 (8.82)
Family structure
 Two-parent intact 55 (80.88) 47 (69.12) χ 2 (1) = 2.51
 Not intact 13 (19.2) 21 (30.88)
 Child birth order, M ( SD ) 2.12 (1.38) 2.06 (1.29) t (129) = 0.27
 Family SES 43.12 (10.6) 46.46 (10.9) t (131) = −1.80

Note. n  = 68 for both samples. All statistics were nonsignificant. Marital status was collapsed to intact versus not intact (i.e., mother/stepfather, single mother, separated, other). SES = socioeconomic status measured by Hollingshead Four Factor Index ( Hollingshead, 1975 ). The mean Hollingshead SES scores for each group indicated families were of upper middle class status on average. Calculation of SES score frequencies also indicated that 25.0% ( n  = 34) and 9.0% ( n  = 9) of families fell into lower middle and lower class categories, respectively.