Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;17(8):1169–1196. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv202

Table 6.

Risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events in AF patients with renal impairment

Author, year, country Study population Definition of renal impairment ATT therapy Thromboembolic events Bleeding events
Providência, 201481 Meta-analysis
19 studies
379 506 patients
AF patients with CKD
Cockroft–Gault (n = 5)
MDRD (n = 5)
CKD-EPI (n = 2)
Coding
Warfarin, NOACs, aspirin, or none CKD ↑ TE risk [HR (95% CI) 1.46 (1.20–1.76); P = 0.0001]
End-stage CKD ↑ TE risk [HR (95% CI) 1.83 (1.56–2.14); P < 0.00001]
Warfarin ↓TE in non-end-stage CKD patients [HR (95% CI) 0.39 (0.18–0.86); P < 0.00001]
NOACs ↓TE compared with warfarin [HR (95% CI) 0.80 (0.66–0.96); P = 0.02] and aspirin [HR (95% CI) 0.32 (0.19–0.55); P < 0.0001] in non-end-stage CKD patients
Shah, 2014, Canada82 Retrospective population-based cohort study
Patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the hospital with primary/secondary diagnosis of AF from 1998 to 2007
Dialysis: n = 1626
Mean (SD) age: 75 (8) years; 634 (39.0%) women
Non-dialysis: n = 204 210
Mean (SD) age: 78 (10); 104 652 (51.2%) women
Warfarin vs. no warfarin
OAC: 756 (46.4%) dialysis vs. 103 473 (50.7%) non-dialysis
No. of events (incidence rate per 100 patient-years)
Dialysis patients:
107 (3.12)
On warfarin vs. off-warfarin:
52 (3.37) vs. 55 (2.91)
Non-dialysis patients:
19 489 (2.35)
On warfarin vs. off-warfarin:
9241 (2.19) vs. 10 248 (2.51)
Warfarin use not associated with ↓stroke risk in dialysis patients [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.14 (0.78–1.67)
↓Stroke risk with warfarin use in non-dialysis patients [adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.87 (0.85–0.90)]
No. of events (incidence rate per 100 patient-years)
Dialysis patients:
275 (8.89)
On warfarin vs. off-warfarin: 149 (10.88) vs. 126 (7.31)
Non-dialysis patients:
34 035 (4.32)
On warfarin vs. off-warfarin: 18 340 (4.64) vs. 15 695 (4.00)
Warfarin use ↑bleeding risk in dialysis [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.44 (1.13–1.85)] and non-dialysis [HR (95% CI) 1.19 (1.13–1.85)] patients
Kooiman, 2014, The Netherlands83 724 AF patients without CKD or non-dialysis-dependent CKD on OAC attending the Leiden clinic between 1997 and 2005
Follow-up: 31 December 2010
Median follow-up 2.1 years for stroke/TIA and 2.3 years for major bleeding events
Mean (SD) age 75 (10); 43.5% women
Abbreviated MDRD formula
No CKD (eGFR >60 mL/min): n = 300
Moderate CKD (30–60 mL/min): n = 294
Severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min) = 130
All OACs 45/724 (6.2%) (1.67/100 patient-years) stroke/TIA
↑Stroke/TIA risk in patients with severe CKD vs. those without CKD [HR (95% CI) 2.75 (1.25–6.05)] vs. those with moderate CKD [HR (95% CI) 3.93 (1.71–9.00)]
Similar stroke/TIA risk for patients with moderate CKD vs. without CKD (data not reported)
ISTH criteria for major bleeding
113/724 (15.6%) (4.8/100 patient-years)
Non-significant ↑ in major bleeding risk with severe CKD vs. no CKD [HR (95% CI) 1.66 (0.97–2.86)] and those with moderate CKD [HR (95% CI) 1.86 (1.08–3.21)]
Similar risk of major bleeding for patients with moderate CKD vs. no CKD (data not reported)
Friberg, 2014, Sweden*84 Retrospective analysis of Swedish AF national registry
307 351 patients with hospital diagnosis of AF between 1 July 2005 and 31 December 2010
13 435 (4.4%) with previous diagnosis of renal failure
ICD-10 codes (N17-19) or local codes for dialysis or renal transplantation
Mean (SD) age; % women
Renal failure: 78.4 (10.3); 4802 (35.7%)
No renal failure: 74.8 (12.5); 123 333 (45.6%)
Warfarin at baseline
Renal failure: 3766 (28.0%)
No renal failure: 10 794 (39.9%)
↑ Annual rate of ischaemic stroke [3.9 vs. 2.9%; HR (95% CI) 1.25 (1.16–1.34)] and TE [8.2 vs. 5.2%; HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.35–1.49)] with renal failure; however, no significant difference after full adjustment for confounders [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.02 (0.95–1.10) and 1.12 (1.07–1.18) for ischaemic stroke and TE, respectively]
Irrespective of renal function, patients on warfarin at baseline had ↓ stroke and TE than those not on warfarin at baseline [HR 0.69 vs. 0.70 in patients with and without renal failure; P-value for interaction P = 0.865]
↑ Annual rate of any bleeding [9.8 vs. 4.1%; HR (95% CI) 2.24 (2.14–2.35)] and ICH [0.8 vs. 0.5%; HR (95% CI) 1.50 (1.28–1.74)] with renal failure
Renal failure-independent risk factor for any bleeding [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.48–1.63)] and ICH [adjusted HR 1.27 (1.09–1.49)]
Chao, 2014, Taiwan85 Retrospective analysis of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2011
10 999 AF patients with ESRD undergoing renal replacement therapy, not on OAC or APT
Mean (SD) age 71.0 (11.1) years; 5913 (53.8%) women
ESRD defined by ICD-9-CM codes None Ischaemic stroke
1217 pts. (11.7%); incidence rate of 6.9 per 100 patient-years

9.7% severe bleeding (bleeding not defined)
Roldán, 2013, Spain*86 978 consecutive stable anticoagulated (INR 2.0–3.0 within previous 6 months) AF patients from outpatient clinic
Median (IQR) age 76 (70–81); 482 (49.3%) women
Median (IQR) follow-up: 875 (706–1059) days
MDRD
Renal impairment: eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2
OAC CV events (stroke, TIA, peripheral embolism, ACS, acute HF, and cardiac death)
113 patients (4.82%/year) adverse CV events; 39 (1.66%/year) strokes
eGFR (categorical variable per 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease) was significantly associated with thrombotic/vascular events [unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.11–1.83); P = 0.006]
Adjusted for ‘high-risk’ (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2) eGFR (per 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease) was significantly associated with thrombotic/vascular events [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.37; 1.07–1.76; P = 0.012]
ISTH criteria for major bleeding
81 patients (3.46%/year) haemorrhagic events
16 ICH (0.68%/year)
eGFR (categorical variable per 30 mL/min/1.73m2 decrease) ↑ risk of bleeding (HR 1.44; 1.08–1.94; P = 0.015)
Adjusted for ‘high-risk’ (HAS-BLED ≥3) eGFR (per 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease) was significantly ↑ risk of bleeding [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.34 (1.00–1.80); P = 0.046]
Banerjee, 2013, France*87 Loire Valley cohort
5912 patients with first recorded AF diagnosis in hospital between 1 January 2000 and December 2010 with baseline serum creatinine data
Mean follow-up: 2.45 (3.56) years
History of renal failure or baseline serum creatinine level >133 µmol/L (men) or >115 µmol/L (women)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) three groups:
≥60 (n = 4375)
30–59 (n = 1196)
<30 (n = 341)
TE (ischaemic stroke, TIA, and peripheral artery embolism)
No. TE events and rate (95% CI) at 1 year
eGFR ≥60: 64; 3.4 (2.4–4.8)
eGFR 30–59: 92; 5.7 (4.2–7.8)
eGFR <30: 15; 7.7 (4.3–13.6)
Normal: 119; 4.4 (3.2–5.9)
As a categorical variable only, eGFR was an independent predictor of TE after adjustment for age, sex, and CHADS2 risk factors but not for baseline characteristics
Apostolakis, 2013, multicentre88 AMADEUS cohort
4576 AF patients. receiving OAC
Mean (SD) age 70 (9) years; 1526 (33.4%) women
Mean (SD) follow-up: 325 (164) days
Baseline serum creatinine available in 4554 (99.5%)
Three most widely used equations to calculate renal function
CrCl (Cockroft–Gault formula),
MDRD and CKD-EPI
Based on CrCl: 1470 (32.35) <60 mL/min
68 (1.5%) <30 mL/min
Warfarin or idraparinux Composite of all stroke/non-CNS SE
45 strokes/non-CNS SE (1.1 events per 100 patient-years)
Only data for CrCl and MDRD reported here (number of events (n/100 patient-years)
CrCl
≥90: 6 (0.6)
60–89: 13 (0.8)
30–59: 26 (2.2)
<30: 0
MDRD
≥90: 2 (0.4)
60–89: 17 (0.8)
30–59: 25 (1.9)
<30: 1 (1.9)
Adjustment for demographic characteristics and co-morbidities, patients with CrCl <60 mL/min had double the risk of risk/SE compared with those with CrCl ≥60 mL/min [adjusted HR (95% CI) 2.27 (1.14–4.52)]
ISTH criteria for major bleeding
103 major bleeds (2.5 events per 100 patient-years)
CrCl
≥90: 15 (1.3)
60–89: 38 (2.4)
30–59: 48 (3.8)
<30: 2 (3.2)
MDRD
≥90: 7 (1.6)
60–89: 53 (2.4)
30–59: 42 (3.2)
<30: 1 (1.9)
Patients with CrCl <60 mL/min had ↑ risk of major bleeding compared with patients with CrCl ≥60 mL/min [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.58 (1.05–2.39); P = 0.027]
Olesen, 2012, Denmark*55 Retrospective analysis of Danish national registries
132 372 patients with hospital discharge diagnosis of AF between 1997 and 2008
ICD codes
No renal disease at baseline: 127 884 (96.6%)
Mean (SD) age 73.2 (12.9); 46.9% women
Non-end-stage CKD: 3587 (2.7%)
Mean (SD) age 76.5 (11.0); 41.0% women
end-stage CKD (dialysis or previous kidney transplant): 901 (0.7%)
Mean (SD) age 66.8 (11.7); 33.6% women
OAC ± ASA, ASA, or none No. of stroke/TE events; event rate per 100 patient-years (95% CI)
No renal disease: 16 648; 3.61 (3.55–3.66)
Non-end-stage CKD: 842; 6.44 (6.02–6.89)
End-stage CKD: 164; 5.61 (4.82–6.54)
Compared with patients with no renal disease, non- end-stage CKD patients [HR (95% CI) 1.49 (1.38–1.59; P < 0.001)] and those on renal replacement [HR (95% CI) 1.83 (1.57–2.14; P < 0.001] had ↑ risk of stroke/TE
Warfarin ↓ stroke/TE risk in both groups [adjusted HR (95% CI)]
No renal disease:
ASA: 0.59 (0.56–0.61)
OAC: 1.10 (1.06–1.14)
OAC + ASA: 0.69 (0.64–0.74)
Non-end-stage CKD:
ASA: 0.84 (0.69–1.01)
OAC: 1.25 (1.07–1.47)
OAC + ASA: 0.76 (0.56–1.03)
Renal replacement:
ASA: 0.44 (0.26–0.74)
OAC: 0.88 (0.59–1.32)
OAC + ASA: 0.82 (0.37–1.80)
No. of major bleeding events; event rate per 100 patient-years (95% CI)
No renal disease: 16 195; 3.54 (3.48–3.59)
Non-end-stage CKD: 1097; 8.77 (8.26–9.30)
Renal replacement: 243
8.89 (7.84–10.08)
Adjusted HR (95% CI)
No renal disease:
ASA: 1.28 (1.23–1.33)
OAC: 1.21 (1.16–1.26)
OAC + ASA: 2.18 (2.07–2.30)
Non-end-stage CKD:
ASA: 1.36 (1.17–1.59)
OAC: 1.12 (0.96–1.30)
OAC + ASA: 1.63 (1.32–2.02)
Renal replacement:
ASA: 1.27 (0.91–1.77)
OAC: 1.63 (1.18–2.26)
OAC + ASA: 1.71 (0.98–2.99)
Go, 2009, USA*90 ATRIA cohort
13 535 AF patients diagnosed between 1 July 1996 and 31 December 1997
Mean age of ATRIA cohort 71.6 years; 42.8% women
Follow-up until 30 September 2003
MDRD
Baseline serum creatinine not available in 2627 (19.4%) patients
eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2: n = 7690
45–59 mL/min/1.73m2: n = 2499
<45 mL/min/1.73m2: n = 1338
None
33 165 patient-years off-OAC among 10 908 AF patients
676 TE events (637 ischaemic strokes) during periods off-warfarin
eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2: 344 events
45–59 mL/min/1.73 m2: 168 events
<45 mL/min/1.73 m2: 149 events
15 events in patients with unknown kidney function
Crude rates of TE off-warfarin by eGFR
eGFR ≥60: 1.63
45–59 : 2.76
<45: 4.22
Rate of TE off-warfarin ↑ significantly with lower eGFR
Adjusted (for age, sex, ethnicity, education, income, previous stroke, HF, DM, hypertension, and CHD) HR (95% CI) for TE compared with eGFR ≥60
eGFR 45–59: 1.16 (0.95–1.40)
eGFR <45: 1.39 (1.13–1.71)
Graded increased independent risk of TE with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2

AMADEUS, Atrial fibrillation trial of Monitored, Adjusted Dose vitamin K antagonist, comparing Efficacy and safety with Unadjusted SanOrg 34006/idraparinux study; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AF, atrial fibrillation; ASA, aspirin; ATRIA, AnTicoagulation and RIsk factors in Atrial fibrillation; ATT, antithrombotic therapy; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CKD-EPI, chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation; CNS, central nervous system; CrCl, creatinine clearance; CV, cardiovascular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; ICD, International Classification of Disease; ICH, intracranial haemorrhage; IQR, interquartile range; ISTH, International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Diet; min, minute; mL, millilitres; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC, oral anticoagulation; SD, standard deviation; TE, thromboembolism; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; vs., versus.

, not reported; *, included in meta-analysis81; ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.