Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 21;109(4):372–383. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esy009

Table 1.

Summary of the datasets used in this study

Dataset Mexican wolves Gray wolves Dogs Total Autosomal SNPs XY SNPs Total SNPs Call rate Citation
MW 83 0 1 84a 166582 5532 172114 0.989 This study
MW-cleaned 83 0 1 84 62219 0 62219 0.989 This study
MW-cleaned-pruned 83 0 1 84 7295 0 7268 0.989 This study
LUPA 0 15 532 547 169066 5744 174810 0.983 Vaysse et al. (2011)
NAC 8 297 91 396 120671 3130 123801 0.946 Cronin et al. (2014)
EURO 0 59 0 59 131118 3430 134548 0.982 Stronen et al. (2013)
HUSK 0 0 10 10 166583 5532 172115 0.987 Vernau et al. (2013)
Merged 89b 371 634 1094 169066 0 169066 0.861 This study
Merged-cleaned 88 299 634 1021 118287 0 118287 0.991 This study
Merged-cleaned- pruned 88 299 634 1021 74876 0 74876 0.991 This study

The Mexican wolf (MW) and Merged datasets are shown before quality control, after removal of low quality loci and individuals (“Cleaned”), and again after removal of loci in high linkage disequilibrium (“Pruned”). “Merged” datasets include the combination of MW, LUPA, NAC, EURO, and HUSK samples.

aEighty-four individuals remained after initial removal of 8 replicates and 4 with low call rate.

bTwo Mexican wolves overlapped both the MW and NAC datasets.