Table 1. Distribution of osteoporotic endplate fracture (EPF) in male subjects.
Vertebral level | Grade 0.5/1 VD | Grade 2 VD | Grade 3 VD | Total | % | 95% CI | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
uEP | lEP | Both | uEP | lEP | Both | uEP | lEP | Both | ||||||
T4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.7 | 0–2.1 | ||
T5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2.1 | 0–4.5 | ||
T6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2.9 | 0.1–5.6 | ||
T7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.3 | 0.9–7.6 | ||
T8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2.1 | 0–4.5 | ||
T9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4.3 | 0.9–7.6 | ||
T10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.7 | 0–2.1 | ||
T11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7.1 | 2.9–11.4 | ||
T12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 29 | 20.7 | 14.0–27.4 | ||
L1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 10 | 37 | 26.4 | 19.1–33.7 | ||
L2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 12.1 | 6.7–17.6 | ||
L3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8.6 | 3.9–13.2 | ||
L4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7.9 | 3.4–12.3 | ||
Total | 14 | 2 | 1 | 38 | 6 | 12 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 140 | ||||
u/l ratio | 7 | 6.33 | n/a | |||||||||||
% both | 5.9%* | 21.4%* | 62.7%* |
*, P<0.001. uEP, upper endplate; lEP, lower endplate; both, involvement of both upper and lower endplates; %, total EFPs at each vertebral level divided by total EPFs of this male database, i.e., n=140. u/l ratio, ratio of uEPF/lEPF at each vertebral deformity (VD) grade. % both, percentage of EPF involving both uEP and lEP at each VD grade.