Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;6(22):442. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.10.61

Table 1. Distribution of osteoporotic endplate fracture (EPF) in male subjects.

Vertebral level Grade 0.5/1 VD Grade 2 VD Grade 3 VD Total % 95% CI
uEP lEP Both uEP lEP Both uEP lEP Both
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.7 0–2.1
T5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 2.1 0–4.5
T6 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 2.9 0.1–5.6
T7 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 6 4.3 0.9–7.6
T8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 2.1 0–4.5
T9 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 6 4.3 0.9–7.6
T10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.7 0–2.1
T11 2 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 10 7.1 2.9–11.4
T12 1 0 0 6 3 0 6 0 13 29 20.7 14.0–27.4
L1 0 0 0 9 2 3 13 0 10 37 26.4 19.1–33.7
L2 2 1 0 6 0 2 1 0 5 17 12.1 6.7–17.6
L3 2 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 2 12 8.6 3.9–13.2
L4 1 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 2 11 7.9 3.4–12.3
Total 14 2 1 38 6 12 25 0 42 140
u/l ratio 7 6.33 n/a
% both 5.9%* 21.4%* 62.7%*

*, P<0.001. uEP, upper endplate; lEP, lower endplate; both, involvement of both upper and lower endplates; %, total EFPs at each vertebral level divided by total EPFs of this male database, i.e., n=140. u/l ratio, ratio of uEPF/lEPF at each vertebral deformity (VD) grade. % both, percentage of EPF involving both uEP and lEP at each VD grade.