Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 5;8:17669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35870-x

Table 2.

DFT calculations using two different exchange correlation potential approximations, PBE and LDA.

x ac C11 C12 C44 G B E ν B/G
PBE 0 4.482 702 139 172 210 328 518 0.24 1.56
0.25 4.474 658 141 157 192 314 478 0.25 1.64
0.5 4.462 585 169 133 159 308 407 0.28 1.94
0.75 4.443 513 222 110 123 318 327 0.33 2.59
1 4.423 672 162 42 95 333 260 0.37 3.51
LDA 0 4.421 768 157 181 224 361 556 0.24 1.61
0.25 4.409 769 144 167 215 353 536 0.25 1.64
0.5 4.395 684 183 141 178 349 456 0.28 1.96
0.75 4.375 589 254 125 141 366 374 0.33 2.61
1 4.356 792 173 52 116 379 316 0.36 3.26

Table 2 shows lattice constant (ac in Å), elastic constants of stiffness tensor (C11, C12, C44), G, B, and Young’s moduli (all in GPa), Poisson’s ratio (ν) and Pugh’s ratio (B/G) in relation to the non-metallic alloying content, x, for fcc structured TaC1−xNx.