Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Sep;34(5):313–319. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000334

Table 1.

Age, BMI and pulmonary function testing presented as mean with standard deviation. CALIPER data presented as median with interquartile range. Two-tailed T tests and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used to determine significance. Severity scores compared by chi square.

Cases (n = 77) Controls (n = 19) P

Age 62.2 (± 13.4) 45.2 (± 15.1) 0.0001

BMI (kg/m2) 28.7 (± 5.9) 25.7 (± 3.7) 0.008

Gender 0.39
 M 34 (44%) 9 (47%)
 F 43 (56%) 10 (53%)

FEV1 % predicted 73.9% (± 19.0) 102.5% (± 8.7) <0.0001

FVC % predicted 72.1% (± 17.9) 102.4% (± 9.6) <0.0001

FEV1/FVC 85.2 (± 11.4) 80.5 (± 4.9) 0.008

CALIPER
 Normal 51.9% (39.3 – 63.2) 93.5% (84.5 – 98.3) <0.0001
 Ground glass 34.5% (20.9 – 50.7) 0% (0 – 0) <0.0001
 Reticular 8.2% (3.0 – 13.6) 0% (0 – 0) <0.0001
 Honeycomb 0% (0 – 0.2) 0% (0 – 0) 0.001
 ILA 45.1% (35.3 – 60.6) 0% (0 – 0) <0.0001

Radiologic severity score
 0 0 (0%) 16 (84.2%) <0.0001
 1 19 (26.8%) 3 (15.8%)
 2 35 (49.3%) 0
 3 17 (23.9%) 0

Clinical severity score
 0 4 (5.2%) 19 (100%) <0.0001
 1 15 (19.5%) 0
 2 39 (50.7%) 0
 3 19 (24.7%) 0