Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 29;9:2395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02395

Table 4.

Multilevel estimates for models predicting reappraisal and suppression.

Independent variable Dependent variables
Reappraisal (ICC = 0.01) Suppression (ICC = 0.01)
μ δ(SE) μ δ(SE) μ δ(SE) μ δ(SE)
FIXED EFFECTS
Intercept 3.70*** 8.08 (0.01) 3.70*** 8.08 (0.01) 3.05*** 4.57 (0.02) 3.05*** 4.57 (0.02)
Level 1
Level 1 covariates
Gender 0.08** 0.17 (0.03) 0.09** 0.20 (0.03) −0.10* −0.15 (0.04) −0.10* −0.15 (0.04)
Education 0.01 0.02 (0.02) 0.01 0.02 (0.02) −0.01 −0.01 (0.03) −0.01 −0.01 (0.03)
Experience 0.01 0.02 (0.01) 0.01 0.02 (0.01) 0.04** 0.06 (0.01) 0.04** 0.06 (0.01)
Position 0.01 0.02 (0.02) 0.01 0.02 (0.02) −0.07** −0.10 (0.02) −0.07** −0.10 (0.03)
selfM 0.11*** 0.24 (0.02) 0.11*** 0.24 (0.02) 0.32*** 0.48 (0.03) 0.32*** 0.48 (0.03)
Level 2
Level 2 covariates
School type −0.03 −0.07 (0.03) 0.02 0.03 (0.03)
PDRP 0.35* 0.76 (0.14) −0.21 −0.31 (0.16)
NDRP −0.11 −0.24 (0.09) 0.28** 0.42 (0.09)
Level 2 predictor
EJD 0.31* 0.46 (0.12)
Trust 0.01 0.02 (0.07)
RANDOM EFFECT
Level 1(σ2) 0.19 0.19 0.39 0.39
Level 2(τ00) 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.003
EXPLAINED VARIANCE
Level 1 8.51% 10.60%
Level 2 33.23% 52.81%
*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001; EJD, emotional job demands of teaching; Trust, trust in colleagues; PDRP, positive display rule perceptions; NDRP, negative display rule perceptions; SelfM, self-monitoring.