Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2018 Nov 26;11(12):1643–1652. doi: 10.1002/aur.2029

Table.2.

ROIs with aberrant FC in ASD compared with controls

ROI number ROI name x y z
Cluster1
1 HippoCampus 27 −18 −15
2 Precuneous Cortex 0 −57 51
3 Inferior Temporal Gyrus, anterior division 45 −9 −39
4 Medial Prefrontal cortex 3 60 −6
5 Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division −39 −69 24
6 MiddleTemporal Gyrus 57 −36 6
7 Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division 48 −75 18
8 Frontal Pole −27 42 42
9 Middle Temporal Gyrus −60 −27 −12
10 Middle Temporal Gyrus −60 −60 9
11 Middle Frontal Gyrus 33 27 51
Cluster2
12 Insular Cortex −30 18 9
13 Occipitotemporal 42 −60 −3
14 Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division 24 −78 33
15 Postcentral Gyrus 30 −39 60
16 Frontal Pole 42 36 24
17 Paracingulate Gyrus 0 30 36
18 *Supramarginal Gyrus, anterior division −51 −36 54
19 Lateral Occipital Cortex, inferior division −24 −87 3
20 Superior Frontal Gyrus −21 9 51
21 Precentral Gyrus −51 −3 39
22 Supramarginal Gyrus, posterior division 63 −36 39
23 Superior Frontal Gyrus 30 0 63

Regions with index from 1-11 belong to Cluster1 while regions with index from 12-23 belong to Cluster2. Regions with star represent the seed region obtained from the functional ‘connectedness’ analysis.