Table 4.
TMS characteristics of the four studies (seven samples) examining the impact of location on the correlation between rMT and motor scores.
| C N = 11 | SC N = 46 | CSC N = 12 | BS N = 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rMT AH (%MSO) | ||||
| Liepert et al. (33) | 56 ± 12 | 53 ± 12 | _ | 59 ± 11 |
| Ward et al. (25) | _ | 57 ± 19 | _ | 53 ± 2 |
| Bastings et al. (26) | _ | 73 ± 17 | 82 ± 26 | _ |
| Veldema et al. (40) | 96 ± 9 | 89 ± 19 | 78 ± 19 | _ |
| rMT UH (%MSO) | ||||
| Liepert et al. (33) | 46 ± 6 | 45 ± 10 | _ | 45 ± 8 |
| Ward et al. (25) | _ | _ | _ | _ |
| Bastings et al. (26) | _ | 67 ± 12 | 68 ± 23 | _ |
| Veldema et al. (40) | 54 ± 7 | 71 ± 19 | 60 ± 7 | _ |
C, cortical; SC, subcortical; CSC, corticosubcortical; BS, brainstem; AH, affected hemisphere; UH, unaffected hemisphere; MSO, Maximal Stimulator Output.