Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;9:1711. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01711

Table 2.

Participants’ body composition before and after the 2-week training program supported with the whole body cryostimulation protocol.

Group Baseline mean ± SD Observed change mean ± SD (%) Adjusted changea mean ± SD (%) Adjusted effectb
mean;CI (%) lnferencec
Female
Body weight (kg) CON 64.2 ± 9.7 -1 ± 2 -1 ± 2 2 Trivial
CRY 64.0 ± 10.3 0 ± 1 0 ± 1 -2 to 5
SMM (kg) CON 27.3 ± 3.3 2 ± 4 2 ± 4 2 Trivial
CRY 27.8 ± 3.7 8 ± 3 4 ± 3 4–9
Body fat (%) CON 22.9 ± 3.8 -8 ± 8 -8 ± 9 6 Small
CRY 21.6+4.0 -4 ± 9 -2 ± 10 -8 to 21
Male
Body weight (kg) CON 79.9 ± 8.1 -1 ± 1 -1 ± 1 0 Trivial
CRY 79.7+8.1 -1 ± 1 -1 ± 1 -2 to 2
SMM (kg) CON 40.5 ± 2.6 0 ± 1 0 ± 1 1 Trivial
CRY 40.8 ± 3.0 1 ± 2 1 ± 2 -2 to 5
Body fat (%) CON 10.9 ± 5.1 -3 ± 12 -2 + 14 -5 Trivial
CRY 10.6 ± 4.5 -8 ± 11 -7 + 13 -23 to 19

SMM, skeletal muscle mass; CON, control; CRY, cryotherapy. CI, 90% confidence interval. All data are percentages, with the exception of baseline values express measurement units. aAdjusted to overall mean of in baseline CON and CRY group. bAdjusted mean change of CRY group minus adjusted mean CON group. cMagnitude thresholds (for difference in means divided by SD of CRY group): <0.20, trivial; 0.20–0.59, small; 0.60–1.19, moderate.