Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 17;14:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.11.001

Table 1.

This study included 706 patients who received BT in our hospital from July 2004 to January 2014. Of 706 patients, 265 (38%) were treated with combined BT and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Half of the patients were classified as clinical T1c, and 340 patients (48%) had an intermediate risk based on the D’Amico risk classification.

BT as monotherapy 441 (62%)
BT + EBRT 265 (38%)
None 390 (55%)
Neoadjuvant ADT 243 (35%)
Adjuvant ADT 10 (1%)
Neo ADT/ adjuvant ADT 63 (9%)



Clinical stage
T1c 351 (50%)
T2a 239 (34%)
T2b 58 (8%)
T2c 30 (4%)
T3a 28 (4%)



D‘Amico risk classification
Low risk 248 (35%)
Intermediate risk 340 (48%)
High risk (including cT3a) 118 (17%)



Gleason Score
−6 322 (45%)
7 323 (46%)
8- 61 (9%)



Median age (years) 70 (range 48–84)
Median PSA (ng/mL) 7.16 (range 1.17–113)
Median PV (mL) 24.6 (range 7.7–61.9)
Mean total IPSS 7.99 (range 0–33)
Mean IPSS-QOL score 3.9 (range 0–6)
Mean total OABSS 3.45 (range 0–14)

BT = brachytherapy, EBRT =  external beam radiation therapy, ADT = androgen deprivation therapy, PSA = prostate-specific antigen, PV =  prostate volume, IPSS =  International Prostate Symptom Score, OABSS =  Overactive Bladder Symptom Score.