Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 6;24(14):1883–1891. doi: 10.1177/1352458517735190

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Forest plot for proportion of patients with clinically meaningful worsening in 29-Item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale score at week 96 for daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a by baseline demographics and disease characteristics.

aOnly patients with available baseline assessment were included in the overall MSIS-29 PHYS analysis.

bPatients included in the overall MSIS-29 PHYS analysis with missing baseline Gd+ lesions data: IM IFN beta-1a, n = 12; daclizumab beta, n = 17.

cPatients included in the overall MSIS-29 PHYS analysis with missing baseline T2 hyperintense lesion volume data: IM IFN beta-1a, n = 13; daclizumab beta, n = 17.

dPatients included in the overall MSIS-29 PHYS analysis missing baseline disease activity data: IM IFN beta-1a, n = 4; daclizumab beta, n = 11.