Table 5.

Regression analysis to assess the presence of NCP/MP according to FIB

Model	Variables	Men		Women
		OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P
Model 1	FIB	1.491 (0.980–2.269)	0.062	3.206 (1.625–6.326)	0.001
	FIB tertiles
	Tertile 1	1		1
	Tertile 2	0.672 (0.339–1.331)	0.255	2.555 (0.800–8.159)	0.113
	Tertile 3	1.226 (0.627–2.399)	0.551	8.337 (2.723–25.521)	< 0.001
Model 2	FIB	1.416 (0.854–2.347)	0.178	2.557 (1.164–5.617)	0.019
	FIB tertiles
	Tertile 1	1		1
	Tertile 2	0.626 (0.304–1.288)	0.203	2.386 (0.723–7.878)	0.153
	Tertile 3	0.986 (0.463–2.101)	0.970	5.823 (1.696–19.994)	0.005
Model 3	FIB	1.416 (0.843–2.369)	0.189	3.677 (1.539–8.785)	0.003
	FIB tertiles
	Tertile 1	1		1
	Tertile 2	0.654 (0.312–1.370)	0.260	2.885 (0.797–10.439)	0.106
	Tertile 3	1.004 (0.465–2.169)	0.992	8.531 (2.153–33.802)	0.002

Model 1 unadjusted

Model 2 adjusted for dyslipidemia, hsCRP (P < 0.05 in univariate analysis)

Model 3 adjusted for dyslipidemia, diabetes, statins, beta-blocker and hsCRP (P < 0.1 in univariate analysis)