Table 2.
Comparison of the behavioral data of the ultimatum game in patients with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls
| Mean (SD) | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HC | AN | ||
| UG responder | |||
| Acceptance rate of ‘unfair offer’ (%) | 70.8 (34.6) | 51.0 (41.8) | .089 |
| Acceptance rate of ‘fair offer’ (%) | 92.6 (14.2) | 93.8 (16.9) | .81 |
| Minimum acceptable amount (JPY) | 159.1 (85.4) | 241.7 (147.2) | .026 |
| UG proposer | |||
| Offered amount (JPY) | 314.8 (98.6) | 402.1 (79.5) | .002 |
Two-tailed p-values of two-sample t-test were calculated in all analyses
HC Healthy Control, AN Anorexia Nervosa, UG Ultimatum Game, JPY Japanese Yen