Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 30;25(12):1438–1445. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12966

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy of APRI, Fib‐4 and GPR using LSM as a reference in patients with chronic hepatitis C

F0‐1 vs F2‐4 F0‐3 vs F4
APRI
AUROC (95% CI) 0.58 (0.41‐0.75) 0.51 (0.06‐0.97)
Cut‐off values 0.5 1.5 1.0 2.0
Sensitivity/specificity (%) 73/34 27/88 50/77 25/95
Correctly classified (%) 41 77 76 92
PPV/NPV (%) 20/85 33/84 10/97 20/96
Positive/negative LR 1.1/0.8 2.2/0.8 2.2/0.7 4.9/0.8
Fib‐4
AUROC (95% CI) 0.51 (0.34‐0.68) 0.48 (0.09‐0.87)
Cut‐off values 1.45 3.25
Sensitivity/specificity (%) 43/50 14/92
Correctly classified (%) 49 78
PPV/NPV (%) 16/80 29/83
Positive/negative LR 0.9/1.1 1.8/0.9
GPR
AUROC (95% CI) 0.56 (0.37‐0.75) 0.62 (0.34‐0.90)
Cut‐off values 0.28 0.28
Sensitivity/specificity (%) 69/40 75/39
Correctly classified (%) 45 41
PPV/NPV (%) 19/87 6/97
Positive/negative LR 1.2/0.8 1.2/0.6

AUROC, area under the receiving operator curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.