Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;94(6):1308–1313. doi: 10.1111/php.12976

Table 3.

Initial and worst subsequent pathologic diagnoses for patients who underwent LEEP

Exposed to Proflavine and Underwent LEEP (%)(n = 124/232, 53%) Not Exposed to Proflavine and Underwent LEEP (%)(n = 96/160, 60%)
Worst Subsequent Pathologic Diagnosis Worst Subsequent Pathologic Diagnosis
Normal Colposcopy/No Biopsy(%) NIL (%) CIN 1 (%) CIN 2/3 (%) AIS (%) Invasive Cancer (%) Total (%) Normal Colposcopy/No Biopsy (%) NIL (%) CIN 1 (%) CIN 2/3 (%) AIS (%) Invasive Cancer (%) Total (%)
Initial Pathologic Diagnosis
NIL 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 6 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (3) 4 (4) 0 (0) 1 (1) 8 (8)
CIN 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (6) 9 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 16 (13) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (3) 9 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 12 (13)
CIN 2/3 0 (0) 8 (6) 11 (9) 81 (65) 0 (0) 0 (0) 100 (81) 0 (0) 5 (5) 8 (8) 63 (66) 0 (0) 0 (0) 76 (79)
AIS 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Total 0 (0) 9 (7) 18 (15) 96 (77) 0 (0) 1 (1) 124 (100) 0 (0) 5 (5) 14 (15) 76 (79) 0 (0) 1 (1) 96 (100)

Inline graphic, Cases where subsequent pathology was equal to initial; Inline graphic, Cases where subsequent pathology was worse than initial; Normal Colposcopy/No Biopsy = Follow‐up colposcopy examinations were normal and did not require additional biopsies; NIL = Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion (normal, inflammation, hyperplasia and metaplasia); CIN 1 = Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 1; CIN 2/3 = Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 2, 3 and 2/3; AIS = Adenocarcinoma In‐situ; Invasive Cancer = Invasive adenocarincoma.