Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;53(6):1110–1123. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12423

Table 4.

Goodness‐of‐fit (Akaike information criterion—AIC) and regression weights with 95% confidence intervals explaining depressive symptoms, and emotion‐regulation strategies (approach, avoidant, worry and externalizing), with the best fitting models and significant predictor variables shown in bold

Model AIC Age Gender Neighbouring SES Diagnosis Age × Diagnosis χ²
Depressive symptoms 0 –647.3
1 –663.7 –.02 [–.03 to –.01] –.01 [–.04 to .03] –.02 [–.03 to –.00] 22.41***
2 –671.9 –.02 [–.03 to –.01] –.00 [–.04 to .03] –.01 [–.03 to –.00] .06 [.02 to .10] 10.27**
3 –673.9 –.01 [–.02 to .00] –.01 [–.04 to .03] –.01 [–.02 to .01] .06 [.02 to .10] –.02 [–.03 to –.00] 3.92*
Approach 0 829.6
1 789.5 .05 [.03 to .07] .17 [.09 to .24] .00 [–.03 to .03] 46.03***
2 790.8 .05 [.03 to .07] .17 [.09 to .24] –.00 [–.03 to .03] –.03 [–.10 to .05] 0.69
3 792.7 .05 [.03 to .07] .16 [.09 to .24] –.00 [–.03 to .03] –.03 [–.10 to .05] –.01 [–.05 to .03] 0.19
Avoidant 0 778.7
1 779.8 –.01 [–.03 to .01] –.06 [–.13 to .01] –.02 [–.05 to .02] 5.02
2 776.5 –.01 [–.03 to .01] –.05 [–.12 to .06] –.01 [–.02 to .02] .09 [.01 to .16] 5.24*
3 778.3 –.01 [–.03 to .01] –.05 [–.12 to .06] –.01 [–.02 to .02] .09 [.01 to .16] –.01 [–.05 to .03] 0.23
Worry 0 767.2
1 757.6 –.02 [–.04 to –.00] .12 [.05 to .20] –.02 [–.06 to .02] 15.61**
2 759.0 –.02 [–.04 to –.00] .13 [.05 to .21] –.01 [–.06 to .02] .04 [–.06 to .14] 0.67
3 761.0 –.02 [–.04 to –.00] .13 [.05 to .21] –.01 [–.06 to .02] .04 [–.06 to .14] –.00 [–.04 to .04] 0.01
Externalizing 0 528.7
1 533.0 .01 [–.01 to .02] –.04 [–.12 to .02] .00 [–.03 to .03] 1.71
2 530.7 .00 [–.02 to .02] –.04 [–.11 to .03] .01 [–.02 to .04] .08 [.00 to .15] 4.23
3 531.3 .02 [–.02 to .02] –.04 [–.11 to .03] .01 [–.02 to .04] .07 [–.00 to .15] –.02 [–.06 to .02] 1.48

Note: * p < .05, ** p < .01; *** p < .001.