Table 5.

Maximum likelihood estimation of CFA models of the latent structure of the well‐being (MHC‐SF subscales) and psychopathology (OQ‐45 subscales) in psychopathological subgroups

	Mood disorder		Anxiety disorder		Personality disorder		Developmental disorder
	(n = 168)		(n = 101)		(n = 122)		(n = 81)
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
Fit indices	Single factor	Two related factors	Single factor	Two related factors	Single factor	Two related factors	Single factor	Two related factors
χ 2	52.8	7.6	39.1	16.1	57.7	10.5	29.1	13.4
df	9	8	9	8	9	8	9	8
NCP	43.8	0.0	30.1	0.3	48.7	2.5	20.1	5.4
AIC	76.8	33.6	63.1	42.1	81.7	36.5	53.1	39.4
RMSEA	0.171	0.000	0.183	0.101	0.211	0.051	0.167	0.092
CFI	0.966	1.000	0.945	0.983	0.919	0.996	0.948	0.986
Standardized RMR	0.047	0.018	0.053	0.039	0.083	0.036	0.067	0.053
GFI/AGFI	0.91/0.78	0.99/0.96	0.89/0.73	0.95/0.87	0.86/0.68	0.97/0.93	0.89/0.75	0.95/0.86
	Model 1 vs. 2		Model 1 vs. 2		Model 1 vs. 2		Model 1 vs. 2
Δχ 2	45.28***		23.03***		46.97***		15.64***

Note. CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; MHC‐SF, Mental Health Continuum‐Short Form; OQ‐45, Outcome Questionnaire 45; χ ², normal theory weighted least squares Chi‐square (smaller values indicate better fit); df, degree of freedom; NCP, estimated noncentrality parameter (smaller values indicate better fit); AIC, Akaike's information criterion (smaller values indicate better fit); RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation (good fit ≤ 0.05; acceptable fit ≤ 0.08); CFI, comparative fit index (good fit ≥ 0.97; acceptable fit ≥ 0.95); standardized RMR, standardized root mean square residual (good fit ≤ 0.05; acceptable fit ≤ 0.10); GFI, goodness of fit index (good fit ≥ 0.95; acceptable fit ≥ 0.90); AGFI, adjusted goodness of fit index (good fit ≥ 0.90; acceptable fit ≥ 0.85).

***p < 0.001, two‐tailed.