Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 8;65(6):1627–1640. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12915

Table 6.

Pooled prevalence estimates (derived from both RE and FE models) of the various predictors namely, cattle species, breed, production system and study period

  Predictors Sample size Prevalence (95% CI) (RE model) Prevalence (95% CI) (FE model)
Species Buffalo 29,037 4.3% (2.7, 6.7) 16.0% (15.5, 16.4)
Cow 53,382 6.3% (4.9, 8.0) 10.2% (9.8, 10.5)
Cattle breed Exotic 2,011 7.0% (3.7, 12.9) 16% (14.1, 18.2)
Cross‐bred 9,548 8.1% (4.6, 13.8) 13.5% (12.7, 14.5)
Indigenous 4,169 7.4% (4.0, 13.1) 15.5% (14.0, 17.1)
Production systems Gaushala 576 19.1% (13.0, 27.1) 18.7% (15.7, 22.3)
Organized farm 43,847 5.1% (3.8, 6.7) 8.4% (8.1, 8.7)
Rural farm 1,607 4.4% (1.0, 16.5) 3.3% (2.2, 4.7)
Study period 1941–1960 26,961 13.8% (10.5, 17.9) 17.0% (16.6, 17.5)
1961–1980 28,073 3.6% (2.6, 4.9) 3.9% (3.6, 4.2)
1981–2000 16,927 7.0% (4.8, 10.2) 13.9% (13.2, 14.6)
2001–2016 10,458 6.8% (4.3, 10.7) 9.2% (8.5, 10.0)