Table 3.
Characteristics of the 20 patients with symptomatic recurrence after SKS
| Case | Age | Sex | Date of SKS | Urgency | Medina | DM | Euroscore (%) | SYNTAX | CABG app? | Stent 1 | Stent 2 | Months to TVR | Urgency | Location of ISR | Treatment | Stent 1 | Stent 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | M | 04/2005 | R | 1,1,0 | 0 | 0.50 | 22 | Yes | Tax | 2.75 | Tax | 3.00 | 88 | R | Cx | SKS | PE | 3.5 | PE | 3.5 |
| 2 | 81 | M | 06/2005 | U | 1,1,1 | 0 | 56.00 | 44 | No | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 3.00 | 26 | U | Cx | SKB | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 3 | 64 | F | 06/2005 | U | 1,1,1 | 0 | 4.00 | 23 | Yes | Tax | 2.75 | Tax | 2.75 | 10 | R | Cx | SKS | Tax | 2.75 | Tax | 2.75 |
| 4 | 58 | M | 09/2005 | R | 1,1,0 | 0 | 0.90 | 21 | Yes | Tax | 3.50 | Tax | 3.50 | 7 | U | Cx and LAD | SKS | Tax | 3.5 | Tax | 3.5 |
| 5 | 57 | M | 11/2005 | R | 1,1,0 | 0 | 1.30 | 38 | Yes | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 3.00 | 12 | R | LAD | SKS | Tax | 3 | Tax | 4 |
| 6 | 69 | M | 06/2006 | R | 1,1,1 | 0 | 1.70 | 48 | Yes | End | 2.75 | End | 2.75 | 4 | R | Cx (occluded) and LAD | Single /SKB | Tax | 3 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 7 | 46 | M | 10/2006 | R | 1,1,1 | 0 | 0.88 | 30 | Yes | Tax | 2.75 | Tax | 2.75 | 121 | R | Cx | SKS | ISAR | 3.5 | ISAR | 3 |
| 8 | 58 | M | 10/2006 | R | 1,1,1 | 0 | 0.88 | 30 | Yes | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 2.50 | 11 | Em | Cx and LAD | SKS | PP | 3 | PP | 2.5 |
| 9 | 55 | M | 12/2006 | R | 1,1,1 | 0 | 0.12 | 24 | Yes | Tax | 2.50 | Tax | 3.00 | 4 | R | Cx and LAD | SKB | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 10 | 73 | F | 05/2007 | U | 1,1,1 | 0 | 35.00 | 14 | No | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 3.00 | 32 | U | LAD | Single/SKB | PP | 3.5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 11 | 61 | F | 11/2007 | U | 1,0,1 | 0 | 5.98 | 16 | No | Tax | 2.75 | Tax | 2.75 | 80 | U | Cx and LAD | SKS | PP | 3 | PP | 3 |
| 12 | 82 | F | 03/2008 | E | 1,1,0 | 1 | 14.03 | 29 | No | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 3.00 | 66 | U | Cx and LAD | SKS | PP | 3 | PP | 3 |
| 13 | 83 | M | 06/2008 | R | 1,1,1 | 0 | 27.25 | 42 | No | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 3.00 | 5 | U | Cx | SKB | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 14 | 72 | M | 09/2008 | U | 1,1,1 | 0 | 16.13 | 58 | No | Tax | 3.00 | Tax | 3.00 | 9 | R | Cx and LAD | SKB (DEB) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 15 | 49 | M | 08/2009 | E | 1,1,1 | 1 | 3.95 | 37 | No | PP | 4.00 | PP | 3.00 | 17 | R | Cx and LAD (+ RCA) | CABG | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 16 | 53 | F | 03/2011 | R | 1,1,0 | 0 | 0.62 | 13 | Yes | PE | 3.00 | PE | 3.00 | 38 | R | Cx | SKB | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 17 | 64 | F | 03/2011 | U | 1,1,1 | 0 | 4.90 | 29 | No | PE | 3.00 | PE | 3.00 | 34 | R | Cx and LAD | Single /SKB | Res | 3 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 18 | 54 | M | 03/2015 | E | 1,1,1 | 0 | 0.72 | 30 | No | PP | 3.00 | Xi | 3.00 | 27 | Em | Cx | Sinlge /SKB | ‐ | Onyx | 3 | |
| 19 | 69 | F | 06/2015 | E | 1,0,1 | 0 | 10.00 | 12 | No | PP | 3.50 | PP | 3.00 | 12 | U | Cx and AD | SKS | PP | 3.5 | PP | 3.5 |
| 20 | 80 | M | 01/2016 | R | 1,1,1 | 0 | 1.10 | 38 | No | PP | 3.00 | PP | 3.50 | 13 | Em | Cx and LAD | Single/SKB | Onyx | 3.5 | ‐ | ‐ |
Abbreviations: CABG app’?, coronary artery bypass graft surgery potenially appropriate?; Cx, left circumflex artery; DEB, drug eluting balloon; DM, diabetes mellitus; E, emergency; End, endeavor; F, female; LAD, left anterior descending artery; M, male; PE, promus element; PP, promus permier; R, routine; RCA, right coronary artery; Res, resolute; SKB, simultaneous kissing balloons; SKS, simultaneous kissing stents; U, urgent; Tax, Taxus; TVR, target vessel revascularization.
Age at the index procedure. Stent sizes are diameters (mm). Stent 1 and 2 indicates the stents deployed to the LMS‐LAD and LMS‐Cx barrels, respectively. Cases are listed in the same order as shown in Figure 4. The patients’ details at the time of their first procedure are presented in the left hand side, and on the right are relevant details at the time of their second procedure.