Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 18;361:k2387. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2387

Table 3.

Meta-analysed prevalence of incidentalomas

Imaging request Organ of incidentaloma No of systematic reviews‡ No of primary studies No of patients with incidentalomas Meta-analysed prevalence of incidentalomas (%; 95% CI) τ2 I2 (%) Proportion (%) of heterogeneity explained by study size (R2 via meta-regression)
MRI spine Spine 1 7 129 22 (19 to 26) 0 0 0
Cardiac MRI Extra-cardiac 1 11 1916 34 (22 to 46) 0.05 99 42
CT chest (including CT cardiac) Thorax, abdomen, spine, heart 2 22 8194 45 (36 to 55) 0.05 99 0
CT chest* Pulmonary vasculature (pulmonary embolism) 2 5 137 2 (1 to 4) 0.002 91 0
CT chest† Pulmonary vasculature (pulmonary embolism) 2 9 171 2 (1 to 3) 0.002 88 0
CT colonoscopy Extra-colon 1 11 998 38 (21 to 57) 0.09 99 0
MRI brain Brain 2 27 4525 22 (14 to 31) 0.07 100 0.22
Whole body PET, PET/CT* Thyroid, colon 2 3 133 2 (1 to 4) 0.003 97 95
Whole body PET, PET/CT† Thyroid, colon, parotid, breast, prostate 6 93 7322 0.25 (2 to 3) 0.004 99 0.25

CT=computed tomography; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; PET= positron emission tomography.

*

Analysis only includes patients without a history of cancer.

Sensitivity analysis including patients with known or suspected cancer.

Fifteen systematic reviews provided data to quantify the prevalence of detecting incidentalomas. The two results from whole body PET-PET/computed tomography overlap,† is the sensitivity analysis).