Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr 25;30(8):1185–1196. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01271

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Model for contributions of M1 and M2 to CDA amplitude after M2 (1000–1400 msec) for Experiment 1 (top) and Experiment 2 (bottom). The projected CDA amplitude (empty bars) was calculated as a weighted sum of the grand-averaged CDA during the first retention interval (300–700 msec), for example, the projected CDA for “3+1” in Experiment 2 is 0.54 × CDA amplitude for Load 3 during Retention Interval 1+ 0.98 × CDA amplitude for Load 1 during Retention Interval 1. The observed CDA amplitude (filled bars) is shown for comparison. The closer empty and filled bars, the better the model prediction for that condition. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. There was no significant difference between the projected and observed CDA amplitude for any condition.