Table 3.
Comparison of Entamoeba histolytica sensitivity between whole stool samples and stool samples stored on Whatman protein saver cards
| Application method | DNA extraction method | High parasite load* (N = 10) | Low parasite load† (N = 10) | All samples (N = 20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | ||
| Whole stool directly on Whatman cards | Qiagen | 100% (95% CI: 69%, 100%) | 20% (95% CI: 3%, 56%) | 60% (95% CI: 36%, 81%) |
| Chelex | 90% (95% CI: 56%, 100%) | 50% (95% CI: 19%, 81%) | 70% (95% CI: 46%, 88%) | |
| Stool suspension on Whatman cards | Qiagen | 100% (95% CI: 69%, 100%) | 70% (95% CI: 35%, 93%) | 85% (95% CI: 62%, 97%) |
| Chelex | 90% (95% CI: 56%, 100%) | 60% (95% CI: 26%, 88%) | 75% (95% CI: 51%, 91%) |
CI = confidence interval.
* Whole stool ct value < 30.
† Whole stool ct value ≥ 30.