Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 5;99(6):1613–1618. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0538

Table 3.

Comparison of Entamoeba histolytica sensitivity between whole stool samples and stool samples stored on Whatman protein saver cards

Application method DNA extraction method High parasite load* (N = 10) Low parasite load† (N = 10) All samples (N = 20)
Sensitivity (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI)
Whole stool directly on Whatman cards Qiagen 100% (95% CI: 69%, 100%) 20% (95% CI: 3%, 56%) 60% (95% CI: 36%, 81%)
Chelex 90% (95% CI: 56%, 100%) 50% (95% CI: 19%, 81%) 70% (95% CI: 46%, 88%)
Stool suspension on Whatman cards Qiagen 100% (95% CI: 69%, 100%) 70% (95% CI: 35%, 93%) 85% (95% CI: 62%, 97%)
Chelex 90% (95% CI: 56%, 100%) 60% (95% CI: 26%, 88%) 75% (95% CI: 51%, 91%)

CI = confidence interval.

* Whole stool ct value < 30.

† Whole stool ct value ≥ 30.