Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;99(6):1440–1450. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-1015

Table 6.

Risk factors for Dengue virus exposure

Model 1: risk factors Model 2: risk factors and spatial information Model 3: risk factors, spatial information, and potential sources
Variable OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Gender
 Female REF REF REF
 Male 0.66* [0.43; 1.02] 0.65* [0.42; 1.00] 0.61+ [0.40; 0.94]
Age category (year)
 1–19 REF REF REF
 20–30 0.46++ [0.25; 0.85] 0.44++ [0.24; 0.81] 0.42++ [0.23; 0.77]
 31–45 0.48+ [0.26; 0.88] 0.42++ [0.23; 0.78] 0.45++ [0.24; 0.82]
 46 0.65 [0.34; 1.27] 0.57 [0.29; 1.11] 0.59 [0.31; 1.14]
Migration status
 Native REF REF REF
 15 years or less 1.21 [0.71; 2.07] 1.30 [0.76; 2.22] 1.40 [0.83; 2.36]
 More than 15 years 1.72 [0.89; 3.32] 1.70 [0.88; 3.27] 1.52 [0.81; 2.86]
Income category
 I (lowest) REF REF REF
 II 1.19 [0.59; 2.40] 1.19 [0.60; 2.35] 1.25 [0.65; 2.42]
 III 1.71 [0.86; 3.40] 1.54 [0.81; 2.29] 1.49 [0.78; 2.84]
 IV 1.85* [0.91; 3.75] 1.63 [0.81; 3.29] 1.58 [0.80; 3.10]
KAPi category
 I (lowest) REF REF REF
 II 1.57 [0.78; 3.14] 1.61 [0.81; 3.18] 1.55 [0.80; 3.00]
 III 2.71++ [1.32; 5.54] 2.68 [1.33; 5.40] 2.43++ [1.25; 4.74]
 IV 2.44++ [1.20; 4.98] 2.37 [1.18; 4.76] 2.09+ [1.07; 4.05]
Northing (km) 0.88 [0.72; 1.08] 0.68++ [0.52; 0.89]
Easting (km) 0.72 [0.58; 0.90] 0.5+++ [0.35; 0.70]
 Distance to flooding (m) 0.99903+++ [0.99854; 0.99952]
 Distance to river shore (m) 1.00090+ [1.00019; 1.00160]
Cut 1: primary infection 3.99 [1.31; 6.66] −0.53 [−1.52; 0.46] −1.17 [−2.20; −0.13]
Cut 2: secondary infection 5.97 [3.21; 8.72] 1.40 [0.39; 2.42] 0.76 [−0.26; 1.78]

KAPi = indices for knowledge, attitudes, and practices; OR = odds ratio. The proportional odds/parallel lines assumption was tested with a Wald test. The models do not violate these assumptions (P = 0.750, 0.744, and 0.508, respectively).

P-values: +++ P < 0.001; ++ P < 0.01; + P < 0.05; and *P < 0.10.

The variable was transformed with the natural logarithm.