Table 6.
Risk factors for Dengue virus exposure
| Model 1: risk factors | Model 2: risk factors and spatial information | Model 3: risk factors, spatial information, and potential sources | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | REF | REF | REF | |||
| Male | 0.66* | [0.43; 1.02] | 0.65* | [0.42; 1.00] | 0.61+ | [0.40; 0.94] |
| Age category (year) | ||||||
| 1–19 | REF | REF | REF | |||
| 20–30 | 0.46++ | [0.25; 0.85] | 0.44++ | [0.24; 0.81] | 0.42++ | [0.23; 0.77] |
| 31–45 | 0.48+ | [0.26; 0.88] | 0.42++ | [0.23; 0.78] | 0.45++ | [0.24; 0.82] |
| 46 | 0.65 | [0.34; 1.27] | 0.57 | [0.29; 1.11] | 0.59 | [0.31; 1.14] |
| Migration status | ||||||
| Native | REF | REF | REF | |||
| 15 years or less | 1.21 | [0.71; 2.07] | 1.30 | [0.76; 2.22] | 1.40 | [0.83; 2.36] |
| More than 15 years | 1.72 | [0.89; 3.32] | 1.70 | [0.88; 3.27] | 1.52 | [0.81; 2.86] |
| Income category† | ||||||
| I (lowest) | REF | REF | REF | |||
| II | 1.19 | [0.59; 2.40] | 1.19 | [0.60; 2.35] | 1.25 | [0.65; 2.42] |
| III | 1.71 | [0.86; 3.40] | 1.54 | [0.81; 2.29] | 1.49 | [0.78; 2.84] |
| IV | 1.85* | [0.91; 3.75] | 1.63 | [0.81; 3.29] | 1.58 | [0.80; 3.10] |
| KAPi category | ||||||
| I (lowest) | REF | REF | REF | |||
| II | 1.57 | [0.78; 3.14] | 1.61 | [0.81; 3.18] | 1.55 | [0.80; 3.00] |
| III | 2.71++ | [1.32; 5.54] | 2.68 | [1.33; 5.40] | 2.43++ | [1.25; 4.74] |
| IV | 2.44++ | [1.20; 4.98] | 2.37 | [1.18; 4.76] | 2.09+ | [1.07; 4.05] |
| Northing (km) | – | – | 0.88 | [0.72; 1.08] | 0.68++ | [0.52; 0.89] |
| Easting (km) | – | – | 0.72 | [0.58; 0.90] | 0.5+++ | [0.35; 0.70] |
| Distance to flooding (m) | – | – | – | – | 0.99903+++ | [0.99854; 0.99952] |
| Distance to river shore (m) | – | – | – | – | 1.00090+ | [1.00019; 1.00160] |
| Cut 1: primary infection | 3.99 | [1.31; 6.66] | −0.53 | [−1.52; 0.46] | −1.17 | [−2.20; −0.13] |
| Cut 2: secondary infection | 5.97 | [3.21; 8.72] | 1.40 | [0.39; 2.42] | 0.76 | [−0.26; 1.78] |
KAPi = indices for knowledge, attitudes, and practices; OR = odds ratio. The proportional odds/parallel lines assumption was tested with a Wald test. The models do not violate these assumptions (P = 0.750, 0.744, and 0.508, respectively).
P-values: +++ P < 0.001; ++ P < 0.01; + P < 0.05; and *P < 0.10.
The variable was transformed with the natural logarithm.