Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208571

Table 1. Prevalence of functional constipation, and defecation pattern in total sample and per location in percentage (95% confidence interval).

All Jordan West Bank Gaza
Functional constipation 12,4 (10,5–14,7) 16,5 (13–20,2) 13,4 (8,8–18,2) 2,3 (0,5–4,7)*
Defecation frequency <3/week 2,1 (1,2–3,1) 2,6 (1,2–4,2) 2,4 (0,5–4,8) 0,9 (0,0–2,3)
Fecal incontinence ≥1/week 1,8 (0,9–2,7) 2,6 (1,2–4,2) 0,5 (0,0–1,4)* 1,4 (0,0–3,3)
Stool withholding behavior 5,5 (4,0–7,2) 7,5 (5,1–10,3) 5,3 (2,4–8,2) 1,9 (0,5–3,8)*
Painful bowel movement %(95% CI) 20,0 (17,3–22,7) 23,5 (19,7–27,5) 16,8 (12,0–22,6)** 16,0 (11,1–21,1)**
Rectal mass at physical exam 2,7 (1,8–3,8) 0,9 (0,2–1,9) 7,2 (3,8–11,1)* 1,9 (0,5–3,8)
Large diameter stools 20,6 (17,9–23,30) 25,4 (21,4–29,6) 28,8 (22,6–35,1) 2,8 (0,9–5,2)*
Toilet trained for bowel movement 44,1 (40,7–47,6) 45,2 (40,7–50,1) 41,3 (34,1–49,0) 44,6 (37,1–51,6)
Mushy/watery stools 26,5 (23,5–29,5) 32,8 (28,4–37,5) 18,0 (13,1–23,7)** 22,3 (16,9–28,5)*

*: Significant different compared to Jordan, P< 0,001.

**: Significant different compared to Jordan, P< 0,05.