Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 16;14(11):e1006556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006556

Table 1. Details on models and corresponding species used in in silico essentiality simulations.

Phylum Species Model ID #
Reactions
#
Metabolites
% ORFs Reference
Firmicutes Bacillus subtilis iYO844 1020 988 21% [31]
Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052 iCB925 938 881 18% [32]
Staphylococcus aureus N315 iSB619 641 571 24% [33]
Proteobacteria Escherichia coli K12 iAF1260 2077 1039 29% [34]
Escherichia coli W (ATCC9637) iCA1273 2477 1111 27% [35]
Helicobacter pylori 16695 iIT341 476 485 21% [36]
Klebsiella pneumoniae MGH 78578 iYL1228 1970 1658 24% [37]
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 iJN746 950 911 14% [38]
Salmonella typhimurium LT2 STM_v1.0 2201 1119 28% [39]
Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 iSO783 774 634 15% [40]
Actinobacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv iNJ661 939 828 15% [41]
Chloroflexi Dehalococcoides ethenogenes iAI549 518 549 27% [42]
Cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 iJN678 863 795 21% [43]
Thermotogales Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (None) 562 503 25% [44]
Euryarchaeota Methanosarcina barkeri str. Fusaro iAF692 476 485 14% [45]